Literature DB >> 15773953

Generic cyclosporine formulations: more open questions than answers.

Dario Cattaneo1, Norberto Perico, Giuseppe Remuzzi.   

Abstract

The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) in clinical practice has significantly improved patient and allograft survival after organ transplantation. The new microemulsion CsA formulation, Neoral, has been associated with a more reproducible absorption and a better patient outcome as compared to the old formulation Sandimmune. Recently, several generic CsA formulations have been tested as bioequivalent to Neoral. Bioequivalence tests have been performed in selected groups of young, healthy male volunteers usually in single-dose studies, and then extended to completely different population, such as transplant recipients. However, growing body of evidence shows that CsA pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects is different from that of transplant patients, treated chronically with CsA. Therefore, converting patients from Neoral to the new generic formulations could be detrimental, exposing patients to increased risk of graft function deterioration and graft loss. Thus, more research and more accurate bioequivalence tests are required to address the unanswered problems dealing with the generic CsA formulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773953     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  7 in total

1.  Therapeutic monitoring of pediatric renal transplant patients with conversion to generic cyclosporin.

Authors:  Natalia Riva; Paulo Caceres Guido; Juan Ibañez; Nieves Licciardone; Marcela Rousseau; Gabriel Mato; Marta Monteverde; Paula Schaiquevich
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-05-27

2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Experimental Results Provide Insight into Clinical Performance Differences between Sandimmune® and Neoral® Lipid-Based Formulations.

Authors:  Dallas B Warren; Shadabul Haque; Mitchell P McInerney; Karen M Corbett; Endri Kastrati; Leigh Ford; Hywel D Williams; Vincent Jannin; Hassan Benameur; Christopher J H Porter; David K Chalmers; Colin W Pouton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Neoimmun versus Neoral: a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers and influence of a fat-rich meal on the bioavailability of Neoimmun.

Authors:  F Kees; M Bucher; F Schweda; H Gschaidmeier; L Faerber; R Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.195

4.  An Italian multicentre distributed data research network to study the use, effectiveness, and safety of immunosuppressive drugs in transplant patients: Framework and perspectives of the CESIT project.

Authors:  Valeria Belleudi; Alessandro C Rosa; Marco Finocchietti; Francesca R Poggi; Maria Lucia Marino; Marco Massari; Stefania Spila Alegiani; Lucia Masiero; Andrea Ricci; Gaia Bedeschi; Francesca Puoti; Massimo Cardillo; Silvia Pierobon; Maurizio Nordio; Eliana Ferroni; Martina Zanforlini; Giuseppe Piccolo; Olivia Leone; Stefano Ledda; Paolo Carta; Donatella Garau; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Marina Davoli; Antonio Addis
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of cyclosporine (Imusporin) in renal transplant patients with stable graft function maintained on neoral or bioral.

Authors:  Mrigank S Jha; Aneesh Srivastava; Deepak Dubey; Amit Gupta; R K Sharma; Anant Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04

6.  Is it ethical to prescribe generic immunosuppressive drugs to renal transplant patients?

Authors:  Julie Allard; Marie-Chantal Fortin
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 7.  Oral cyclosporine A--the current picture of its liposomal and other delivery systems.

Authors:  Aleksander Czogalla
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.787

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.