Literature DB >> 15773629

Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging.

Elodie Pagot1, Stefan Fiedler, Peter Cloetens, Alberto Bravin, Paola Coan, Kamel Fezzaa, José Baruchel, Jürgen Härtwig, Karl von Smitten, Marjut Leidenius, Marja-Liisa Karjalainen-Lindsberg, Jani Keyriläinen.   

Abstract

Two x-ray phase contrast imaging techniques are compared in a quantitative way for future mammographic applications: diffraction enhanced imaging (DEI) and phase propagation imaging (PPI). DEI involves, downstream of the sample, an analyser crystal acting as an angular filter for x-rays refracted by the sample. PPI simply uses the propagation (Fresnel diffraction) of the monochromatic and partially coherent x-ray beam over large distances. The information given by the two techniques is assessed by theoretical simulations and compared at the level of the experimental results for different kinds of samples (phantoms and real tissues). The imaging parameters such as the energy, the angular position of the analyser crystal in the DEI case or the sample to detector distance in the PPI case were varied in order to optimize the image quality in terms of contrast, visibility and figure of merit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773629     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Objective measurements of image quality in synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging versus digital mammography.

Authors:  Y Ruiz-Gonzalez; M Perez-Diaz; D Martínez-Aguila; M Diaz-Barreto; I Fleitas; R Mora-Machado; L Rigon; G Tromba; P Bregant
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Noise properties and task-based evaluation of diffraction-enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Jovan G Brankov; Alejandro Saiz-Herranz; Miles N Wernick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-11

3.  Demonstration of synchrotron x-ray phase contrast imaging computed tomography of infiltrative transitional cell carcinoma of the prostatic urethra in a dog.

Authors:  James E Montgomery; Michal J Wesolowski; Bailey Wolkowski; Rajni Chibbar; Elisabeth C R Snead; Jaswant Singh; Murray Pettitt; Pritpal S Malhi; Trinita Barboza; Gregg Adams
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-03-14

4.  Quantitative investigation of the edge enhancement in in-line phase contrast projections and tomosynthesis provided by distributing microbubbles on the interface between two tissues: a phantom study.

Authors:  Di Wu; Molly Donovan Wong; Yuhua Li; Laurie Fajardo; Bin Zheng; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Noise and analyzer-crystal angular position analysis for analyzer-based phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Keivan Majidi; Jun Li; Carol Muehleman; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Computed tomography of amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease using diffraction enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Dean M Connor; Helene Benveniste; F Avraham Dilmanian; Mary F Kritzer; Lisa M Miller; Zhong Zhong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  From synchrotron radiation to lab source: advanced speckle-based X-ray imaging using abrasive paper.

Authors:  Hongchang Wang; Yogesh Kashyap; Kawal Sawhney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.