Literature DB >> 15773068

Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST): a paradigm for the controlled evaluation of candidate medications for cocaine dependence.

Deborah B Leiderman1, Steve Shoptaw, Ann Montgomery, Daniel A Bloch, Ahmed Elkashef, Joseph LoCastro, Frank Vocci.   

Abstract

AIM: Development of effective medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence remains a major priority for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the National Institutes of Health. The Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST) paradigm was developed by the Division of Treatment Research and Development (DT R&D) at NIDA with the goal of enhancing pilot clinical trial validity when systematically assessing a range of medications and drug classes for potential utility in treatment of cocaine dependence.
DESIGN: CREST utilizes a randomized, controlled, parallel group, blinded methodology for comparing one or more marketed medications against a standard, pharmaceutical grade placebo. The trial design is comprised of a flexible 24-week screening/baseline period followed by randomization to an 8-week treatment period. MEASURES: Standard measures of outcomes for the CREST included urinary benzoylecgonine (primary metabolite of cocaine), retention, cocaine craving, depression, clinical global impression and HIV-risk behaviors. In order to facilitate comparisons of data from the CREST studies across sites, drug classes and time, standardized procedures, measures and psychosocial counseling were used.
RESULTS: A total of 19 medications were evaluated in out-patient treatment research clinics in Boston, Cincinnati, Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported decisions to move forward three medications (cabergoline, reserpine, tiagabine) using full-scale, adequately powered, randomized placebo-controlled trial designs. Lessons learned from the CREST experience continue to shape cocaine pharmacotherapy trial design and execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773068     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00988.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances for the treatment of cocaine abuse: central nervous system immunopharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Tobin J Dickerson; Kim D Janda
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Dopamine agonists for the treatment of cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Silvia Minozzi; Laura Amato; Pier Paolo Pani; Renata Solimini; Simona Vecchi; Franco De Crescenzo; Piergiorgio Zuccaro; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-27

3.  Prefrontal GABA levels in cocaine-dependent subjects increase with pramipexole and venlafaxine treatment.

Authors:  Chris C Streeter; John Hennen; Yong Ke; J Eric Jensen; Ofra Sarid-Segal; Leanne E Nassar; Clifford Knapp; Angela A Meyer; Tae Kwak; Perry F Renshaw; Domenic A Ciraulo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Extended-release mixed amphetamine salts and topiramate for cocaine dependence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John J Mariani; Martina Pavlicova; Adam Bisaga; Edward V Nunes; Daniel J Brooks; Frances R Levin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Psychological treatments for stimulant misuse, comparing and contrasting those for amphetamine dependence and those for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Frank J Vocci; Iván D Montoya
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 6.  Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Silvia Minozzi; Michela Cinquini; Laura Amato; Marina Davoli; Michael F Farrell; Pier Paolo Pani; Simona Vecchi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-17

7.  Cocaine Addiction Treatments to improve Control and reduce Harm (CATCH): new pharmacological treatment options for crack-cocaine dependence in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Mascha Nuijten; Peter Blanken; Wim van den Brink; Vincent Hendriks
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Planning multi-arm screening studies within the context of a drug development program.

Authors:  James M S Wason; Thomas Jaki; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.