Literature DB >> 15772969

Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.

Robert V Harrison1, Karen A Gordon, Richard J Mount.   

Abstract

A range of basic and applied studies have demonstrated that during the development of the auditory system, early experimental manipulations or clinical interventions are generally more effective than those made later. We present a short review of these studies. We investigated this age-related plasticity in relation to the timing of cochlear implantation in deaf-from-birth children. Cochlear implantation is a standard intervention for providing hearing in children with severe to profound deafness. An important practical question is whether there is a critical period or cutoff age of implantation after which hearing outcomes are significantly reduced. In this article, we present data from prelingually deaf children (mostly congenitally deaf) implanted at ages ranging from 1 to 15 years. Each child was tested with auditory and speech understanding tests before implantation, and at regular intervals up to 8 years postimplantation. We measured the improvement in performance of speech understanding tests in younger implanted children and compared it with the results of those implanted at a later age. We also used a binary partitioning algorithm to divide the data systematically at all ages at implant to determine the optimum split, i.e., to determine the age at implant which best separates performance of early implanted versus later implanted children. We observed distinct age-of-implant cutoffs, and will discuss whether these really represent critical periods during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15772969     DOI: 10.1002/dev.20052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  47 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

3.  Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children.

Authors:  Ozgul Akin Senkal; Evren Hizal; Haluk Yavuz; Ismail Yilmaz; Levent Naci Ozluoglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of age at onset of deafness and electrical stimulation on the developing cochlear nucleus in cats.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Gary T Hradek; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Musicians' enhanced neural differentiation of speech sounds arises early in life: developmental evidence from ages 3 to 30.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Samantha O'Connell; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Age, plasticity, and homeostasis in childhood brain disorders.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; Brenda J Spiegler; Jenifer J Juranek; Erin D Bigler; O Carter Snead; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  [Long-term functional outcomes of cochlear implants in children].

Authors:  R Laszig; A Aschendorff; R Beck; C Schild; S Kröger; T Wesarg; S Arndt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Can the error detection mechanism benefit from training the working memory? A comparison between dyslexics and controls--an ERP study.

Authors:  Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus; Zvia Breznitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.