BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence that enteral feeding reduces morbidity in critically ill patients and is preferred to parenteral nutrition, the delivery of enteral nutrition (EN) is often inadequate. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of an evidence-based nutrition support (NS) protocol could improve EN delivery. METHODS: An NS protocol incorporating available scientific evidence; data from a retrospective survey of 30 intensive care unit (ICU) patients; and input from dietitians, intensive care physicians, surgeons, nurses, and pharmacists was developed. The impact of this protocol was evaluated prospectively in 123 consecutive adult patients admitted to a multisystem ICU who were eligible for EN. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who received at least 80% of their estimated energy requirements during their ICU stay increased from 20% before implementation of the NS protocol to 60% after implementation (p < .001). After adjusting for confounders, those in the postimplementation group received significantly more kcal/kg/d than the preimplementation group (3.71 kcal/kg/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.64 to 5.78; p = .001). Parenteral nutrition use [corrected] was reduced in the postimplementation group (1.6 vs 13%, p = .02). There was no difference in time to initiation of enteral nutrition between groups (1.76 days preprotocol vs 1.44 days postprotocol implementation, p = .9). CONCLUSIONS: The development and use of an evidence-based NS protocol improved the proportion of enterally fed ICU patients meeting their calculated nutrition requirements.
BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence that enteral feeding reduces morbidity in critically illpatients and is preferred to parenteral nutrition, the delivery of enteral nutrition (EN) is often inadequate. The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of an evidence-based nutrition support (NS) protocol could improve EN delivery. METHODS: An NS protocol incorporating available scientific evidence; data from a retrospective survey of 30 intensive care unit (ICU) patients; and input from dietitians, intensive care physicians, surgeons, nurses, and pharmacists was developed. The impact of this protocol was evaluated prospectively in 123 consecutive adult patients admitted to a multisystem ICU who were eligible for EN. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who received at least 80% of their estimated energy requirements during their ICU stay increased from 20% before implementation of the NS protocol to 60% after implementation (p < .001). After adjusting for confounders, those in the postimplementation group received significantly more kcal/kg/d than the preimplementation group (3.71 kcal/kg/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.64 to 5.78; p = .001). Parenteral nutrition use [corrected] was reduced in the postimplementation group (1.6 vs 13%, p = .02). There was no difference in time to initiation of enteral nutrition between groups (1.76 days preprotocol vs 1.44 days postprotocol implementation, p = .9). CONCLUSIONS: The development and use of an evidence-based NS protocol improved the proportion of enterally fed ICU patients meeting their calculated nutrition requirements.
Authors: Miroslav P Peev; D Dante Yeh; Sadeq A Quraishi; Polina Osler; Yuchiao Chang; Erin Gillis; Caitlin E Albano; Sharon Darak; George C Velmahos Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Brodie A Parent; Samuel P Mandell; Ronald V Maier; Joseph Minei; Jason Sperry; Ernest E Moore; Grant E O'Keefe Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Claudia-Paula Heidegger; Jacques-André Romand; Miriam M Treggiari; Claude Pichard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-04-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Mario I Perman; Agustín Ciapponi; Juan Va Franco; Cecilia Loudet; Adriana Crivelli; Virginia Garrote; Gastón Perman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-06-04