OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which the family influences individual use of general practitioner care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all consultations in one calendar year. Multilevel modelling was used to analyse contact frequencies of individuals within families within practices. SETTING: General practice in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 42 262 families with children aged 2-21 years registered in 96 practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Family influence on individual frequency of contact with general practice and correlation in frequency of contacts between parents and children. RESULTS: After correction for patients' age and sex, analysis of siblings indicates that 22% of the variance in frequencies of contact can be ascribed to influence of the family. This means that contact frequencies of family members within families resemble each other, whereas differences in contact frequencies exist between families. Almost 6% of the variance refers to differences between practices and 73% of the variance refers to individual differences. The strongest correlations were found between mothers and children and between children. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of shared help seeking behaviour within families has considerable implications in the context of the practice.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which the family influences individual use of general practitioner care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all consultations in one calendar year. Multilevel modelling was used to analyse contact frequencies of individuals within families within practices. SETTING: General practice in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 42 262 families with children aged 2-21 years registered in 96 practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Family influence on individual frequency of contact with general practice and correlation in frequency of contacts between parents and children. RESULTS: After correction for patients' age and sex, analysis of siblings indicates that 22% of the variance in frequencies of contact can be ascribed to influence of the family. This means that contact frequencies of family members within families resemble each other, whereas differences in contact frequencies exist between families. Almost 6% of the variance refers to differences between practices and 73% of the variance refers to individual differences. The strongest correlations were found between mothers and children and between children. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of shared help seeking behaviour within families has considerable implications in the context of the practice.
Authors: G P Westert; F G Schellevis; D H de Bakker; P P Groenewegen; J M Bensing; J van der Zee Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: B Starfield; H Katz; A Gabriel; G Livingston; P Benson; J Hankin; S Horn; D Steinwachs Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mieke Cardol; Wil J H M van den Bosch; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Peter P Groenewegen; Liset van Dijk; Dinny H de Bakker Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Julie S Yi; Emmanuel E Garcia Morales; Joshua F Betz; Jennifer A Deal; Lorraine T Dean; Simo Du; Adele M Goman; Michael E Griswold; Priya Palta; George W Rebok; Nicholas S Reed; Roland J Thorpe; Frank R Lin; Carrie L Nieman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Johannes H J M Uijen; Huug J van Duijn; Marijke M Kuyvenhoven; François G Schellevis; Johannes C van der Wouden Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Mira G P Zuidgeest; Liset van Dijk; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Henriëtte A Smit; Bert Brunekreef; Hubertus G M Arets; Madelon Bracke; Hubert G M Leufkens Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Vivian W Leong; Steve Morgan; Sabrina T Wong; Gillian E Hanley; Charlyn Black Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mieke Cardol; Liset van Dijk; Wil J H M van den Bosch; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Dinny H de Bakker; Peter P Groenewegen Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Stefan R Florentinus; Eibert R Heerdink; Liset van Dijk; A M G Fabiënne Griens; Peter P Groenewegen; Hubert G M Leufkens Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-01-11 Impact factor: 2.655