BACKGROUND: For the second time a plan to monitor public health and health inequalities in the Netherlands through general practice was put into action: the Second National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2, 2001). The first aim of this paper is to describe the general design of DNSGP-2. Secondly, to describe self assessed health inequalities in the Netherlands. Thirdly, to present differences in prevalence of chronic conditions by educational attainment using both self-assessed health and medical records of GPs. Finally, inequalities in 1987 (DNSGP-1) and 2001 will be compared. METHODS: Data were collected from 96 (1987) and 104 (2001) general practices. The data include background information on patients collected via a census, approximately 12,000 health interview surveys per time point and more than one million recorded contacts of patients with their GPs in both years. The method of statistical analysis is logistic regression. RESULTS: The analyses shows that the lower educated have significantly higher odds of feeling unhealthy and having chronic conditions in 2001. Diabetes and myocardial infarction (GP data) showed the largest difference in prevalence between educational groups (OR 2.5 and 2.4, self-reported data). The way the data is collected (self-assessment versus GP registration) hardly affects the magnitude of the educational differences in the prevalence of chronic conditions. The pattern of health inequalities across chronic conditions in 1987 and 2001 hardly differs. Diabetes doubled in prevalence and health inequalities were not significant in 1987, but compared to the other conditions were largest in 2001 (OR 1.1 versus 2.5). CONCLUSION: Health inequalities were shown to be substantial in 2001 and persistent over time. Socio-economic differences were shown to be similar using self-assessed health data and GP data. Hence, a person's educational attainment did not appear to play a part in presenting health problems to the GP.
BACKGROUND: For the second time a plan to monitor public health and health inequalities in the Netherlands through general practice was put into action: the Second National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2, 2001). The first aim of this paper is to describe the general design of DNSGP-2. Secondly, to describe self assessed health inequalities in the Netherlands. Thirdly, to present differences in prevalence of chronic conditions by educational attainment using both self-assessed health and medical records of GPs. Finally, inequalities in 1987 (DNSGP-1) and 2001 will be compared. METHODS: Data were collected from 96 (1987) and 104 (2001) general practices. The data include background information on patients collected via a census, approximately 12,000 health interview surveys per time point and more than one million recorded contacts of patients with their GPs in both years. The method of statistical analysis is logistic regression. RESULTS: The analyses shows that the lower educated have significantly higher odds of feeling unhealthy and having chronic conditions in 2001. Diabetes and myocardial infarction (GP data) showed the largest difference in prevalence between educational groups (OR 2.5 and 2.4, self-reported data). The way the data is collected (self-assessment versus GP registration) hardly affects the magnitude of the educational differences in the prevalence of chronic conditions. The pattern of health inequalities across chronic conditions in 1987 and 2001 hardly differs. Diabetes doubled in prevalence and health inequalities were not significant in 1987, but compared to the other conditions were largest in 2001 (OR 1.1 versus 2.5). CONCLUSION: Health inequalities were shown to be substantial in 2001 and persistent over time. Socio-economic differences were shown to be similar using self-assessed health data and GP data. Hence, a person's educational attainment did not appear to play a part in presenting health problems to the GP.
Authors: S D M Bot; J M van der Waal; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; L M Bouter; J Dekker Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-02-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Johanna M van der Waal; Caroline B Terwee; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter; Joost Dekker Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jolanda Maas; Robert A Verheij; Peter P Groenewegen; Sjerp de Vries; Peter Spreeuwenberg Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Umesh T Kadam; Francois G Schellevis; Martyn Lewis; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Henrica C W de Vet; Lex M Bouter; Peter R Croft Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Marieke Zwaanswijk; Peter F M Verhaak; Jan van der Ende; Jozien M Bensing; Frank C Verhulst Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-01-16 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Hanneke Otters; François G Schellevis; Jurgen Damen; Johannes C van der Wouden; Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit; Bart W Koes Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Johannes H J M Uijen; Huug J van Duijn; Marijke M Kuyvenhoven; François G Schellevis; Johannes C van der Wouden Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.386