Literature DB >> 15769436

Gastric and Postpyloric Total Enteral Nutrition.

Souheil G Abou-Assi1, Vikash Khurana, Mitchell L Schubert.   

Abstract

The provision and maintenance of good nutrition in patients with acute and chronic illness is a fundamental part of standard medical and surgical care. Recently, there is great interest in using enteral nutritional support to reverse the morbidity and mortality associated with malnutrition. Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition because it is more physiologic, maintains intestinal structure and function, limits bacterial translocation, has less morbidity, has fewer complications, and is less expensive. However, the decision to feed into the stomach or into the small bowel (postpyloric) continues to be a matter of some debate and continued clinical investigation. Although the gastric route of enteral feeding is easier and less expensive, some physicians worry that gastric feeding may predispose to aspiration and pneumonia, especially in critically ill patients who frequently have delayed gastric transit. In these critically ill patients, small bowel function usually remains relatively intact and placement of a postpyloric feeding tube may permit more effective delivery of nutrients. However, it should be noted that placement of postpyloric feeding tubes can be challenging, and this may lead to a delay in initiation of nutritional support.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 15769436     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-005-0007-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  46 in total

1.  Flexible nasogastric feeding tube tip malposition immediately after placement.

Authors:  R Benya; S Langer; S Mobarhan
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Prevalence of malnutrition in nonsurgical hospitalized patients and its association with disease complications.

Authors:  T H Naber; T Schermer; A de Bree; K Nusteling; L Eggink; J W Kruimel; J Bakkeren; H van Heereveld; M B Katan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Does nasoenteral feeding afford adequate gastroduodenal stress prophylaxis?

Authors:  R J Valentine; W W Turner; K R Borman; J A Weigelt
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  PYY and NPY: control of gastric motility via action on Y1 and Y2 receptors in the DVC.

Authors:  C H Chen; R L Stephens; R C Rogers
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition on gut mucosal permeability in the critically ill.

Authors:  R J Hadfield; D G Sinclair; P E Houldsworth; T W Evans
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Clinical efficacy and design changes of "fine bore" nasogastric feeding tubes: a seven-year experience involving 809 intubations in 403 patients.

Authors:  D B Silk; R G Rees; P P Keohane; H Attrill
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Andrew R Davies; Paul R A Froomes; Craig J French; Rinaldo Bellomo; Geoffrey A Gutteridge; Ibolya Nyulasi; Robyn Walker; Richard B Sewell
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Juan C Montejo; Teodoro Grau; Jose Acosta; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Mercé Planas; Abelardo García-De-Lorenzo; Alfonso Mesejo; Manuel Cervera; Carmen Sánchez-Alvarez; Rafael Núñez-Ruiz; Jorge López-Martínez
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Gastric feeding with erythromycin is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in the critically ill.

Authors:  M A Boivin; H Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Gary P Zaloga
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.