Literature DB >> 15767381

Risk of breast cancer after miscarriage or induced abortion: a Scottish record linkage case-control study.

David H Brewster1, Diane L Stockton, Richard Dobbie, Diana Bull, Valerie Beral.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of breast cancer in patients with a previous history of miscarriage or induced abortion.
DESIGN: Case-control study relating "exposure" to outcome by linkage of national hospital discharge and maternity records, the national cancer registry, and death records.
SETTING: Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Miscarriage analysis-2828 women with breast cancer and 9781 matched controls; induced abortion analysis-2833 women with breast cancer and 9888 matched controls. MAIN
RESULTS: After stratification for age at diagnosis, parity, and age at first birth, the odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of breast cancer was 1.02 (0.88 to 1.18) in women with a previous miscarriage, and 0.80 (0.72 to 0.89) in women with a previous induced abortion. Further adjustments for age at bilateral oophorectomy, socioeconomic status (based on small area of residence), and health board area of residence had only minor effects on these odds ratios.
CONCLUSION: These data do not support the hypothesis that miscarriage or induced abortion represent substantive risk factors for the future development of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15767381      PMCID: PMC1733063          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.026393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  22 in total

1.  Reporting bias in case-control studies on induced abortion and breast cancer.

Authors:  M A Rookus
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Induced abortion as cancer risk factor: a review of epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  L I Remennick
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Which deprivation? A comparison of selected deprivation indexes.

Authors:  R Morris; V Carstairs
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1991-11

Review 4.  Does induced or spontaneous abortion affect the risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  K B Michels; W C Willett
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Case-control differences in the reliability of reporting a history of induced abortion.

Authors:  M T Tang; N S Weiss; J R Daling; K E Malone
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The Scottish Record Linkage System.

Authors:  S Kendrick; J Clarke
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1993-03

7.  Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study.

Authors:  M A Rookus; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-12-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Response bias in a case-control study: analysis utilizing comparative data concerning legal abortions from two independent Swedish studies.

Authors:  B M Lindefors-Harris; G Eklund; H O Adami; O Meirik
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Pregnancy termination in relation to risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  P A Newcomb; B E Storer; M P Longnecker; R Mittendorf; E R Greenberg; W C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  The alleged association between induced abortion and risk of breast cancer: biology or bias?

Authors:  L L Bartholomew; D A Grimes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.347

View more
  7 in total

1.  Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Katherine DeLellis Henderson; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Peggy Reynolds; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Christina A Clarke; Ellen T Chang; Susan Neuhausen; Giske Ursin; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  The prevalence and correlates of breast cancer among women in Eastern China.

Authors:  Zhi-Gang Yu; Cun-Xian Jia; Li-Yuan Liu; Cui-Zhi Geng; Jin-Hai Tang; Jin Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Yu-Yang Li; Zhong-Bing Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Risk factors for breast cancer in Iranian women: a hospital-based case-control study in tabriz, iran.

Authors:  Mina Hosseinzadeh; Jamal Eivazi Ziaei; Nader Mahdavi; Parvaneh Aghajari; Maryam Vahidi; Alaviehe Fateh; Elnaz Asghari
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.588

4.  Pregnancy Loss and Cancer Risk: A Nationwide Observational Study.

Authors:  Anders P Mikkelsen; Pia Egerup; Julie F M Ebert; Astrid M Kolte; Henriette S Nielsen; Øjvind Lidegaard
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-10-09

5.  Breast cancer risk factors in Turkish women--a University Hospital based nested case control study.

Authors:  Vahit Ozmen; Beyza Ozcinar; Hasan Karanlik; Neslihan Cabioglu; Mustafa Tukenmez; Rian Disci; Tolga Ozmen; Abdullah Igci; Mahmut Muslumanoglu; Mustafa Kecer; Atilla Soran
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Obesity, diabetes mellitus, and the risk of female breast cancer in Eastern China.

Authors:  Xiao-Lei Wang; Cun-Xian Jia; Li-Yuan Liu; Qiang Zhang; Yu-Yang Li; Liang Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Hormonal and reproductive risk factors associated with breast cancer in Isfahan patients.

Authors:  Mehdi Tazhibi; Mohsen Dehghani; Shadi Babazadeh; Fariborz Makkarian; Maryam Tabatabaeian; Masoumeh Sadeghi; Parisa Rezaei; Mehri Faghihi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-06-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.