Literature DB >> 15767303

Context cues eliminate retroactive interference effects in honeybees Apis mellifera.

Ken Cheng1.   

Abstract

Free flying honeybees were trained successively on two different tasks of landmark-based spatial memory. On both task 1 and task 2, the goal was at a consistent distance and direction from a cylindrical landmark. The colours of the landmarks differed for the two tasks. The target direction from the landmark in task 2 was opposite to that in task 1. The context in which task 2 took place was either the same as the task-1 context or different: being a short distance away, having different surrounding landmarks, and a different colour on the training table. After each task, the bees were tested on task 1 in the task-1 context (test 1 and test 2). If task 2 had the same context as task 1, the bees performed at chance on test 2. If task 2 had a different context, performance on test 2 was unaffected, remaining as good as on test 1. Contextual cues thus guide memory retrieval, and prevent any confusions about which response (that appropriate for task 1 or for task 2) to perform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15767303     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course?

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Patrick Schultheiss; Guy Beugnon; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Skyline retention and retroactive interference in the navigating Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Christopher Whyte; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Terrestrial cue learning and retention during the outbound and inbound foraging trip in the desert ant, Cataglyphis velox.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Multi-modal cue integration in the black garden ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Felix Benjamin Oberhauser; Maria Loconsole; Gabriella Galli; Federica Dal Cin; Enzo Moretto; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Release from proactive interference in rat spatial working memory.

Authors:  William A Roberts; Hayden MacDonald; Lyn Brown; Krista Macpherson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Distance and direction, but not light cues, support response reversal learning.

Authors:  S L Wright; G M Martin; C M Thorpe; K Haley; D M Skinner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Visually guided decision making in foraging honeybees.

Authors:  Shaowu Zhang; Aung Si; Mario Pahl
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Cognitive plasticity in foraging Vespula germanica wasps.

Authors:  Paola D'Adamo; Mariana Lozada
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Great apes selectively retrieve relevant memories to guide action.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bobrowicz; Mikael Johansson; Mathias Osvath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.