Literature DB >> 15765858

A randomized trial assessing the value of ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery for interventional investigations.

Oliver Dudeck1, Ulf Teichgraeber, Petr Podrabsky, Enrique Lopez Haenninen, Reingard Soerensen, Jens Ricke.   

Abstract

Using a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic angiography via transfemoral access, we sought to determine those patients who may benefit from ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery. One-hundred-twelve patients with normal anticoagulation parameters were randomized in two groups. Fifty-six patients received ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery, 56 patients underwent traditional palpation-guided vessel cannulation. Parameters assessed included procedure-time, number of attempts for successful puncture, intensity of the arterial pulse, previous ipsilateral punctures, history and risk factors of arteriosclerosis and leg circumference at the site of puncture. The data was analyzed by using outcome measures according to evidence-based medicine criteria. Only in patients with weak arterial pulse and thoses with a leg circumference of 60 cm or greater ultrasound guidance significantly decreased the number of attempts needed as well as the time for successful arterial puncture. In both patient subgroups, the number needed to treat (NNT) was 2, the absolute benefit increase (ABI) was 50 and 57%, respectively. In contrast, time for vessel cannulation was increased in patients with strong arterial pulse using ultrasound guidance. No significant differences were found with respect to diminished complications neither comparing both patient groups nor comparing risk subgroups. In conclusion ultrasound guidance for femoral artery access is recommended only in patients with a weak or absent arterial pulse and obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15765858     DOI: 10.1023/b:caim.0000041949.59255.3f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  21 in total

Review 1.  Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access. The Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  C A Lewis; T E Allen; D R Burke; J F Cardella; S J Citron; P E Cole; A T Drooz; E A Drucker; Z J Haskal; L G Martin; A Van Moore; C D Neithamer; S B Oglevie; K S Rholl; A C Roberts; D Sacks; O Sanchez; A Venbrux; C W Bakal
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Incidence and results of arterial complications among 16,350 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  S C Babu; G O Piccorelli; P M Shah; J H Stein; R H Clauss
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Complications of intravenous feeding catheters.

Authors:  M M Mughal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures.

Authors:  R S Altin; S Flicker; H J Naidech
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein for acute haemodialysis access.

Authors:  T H Kwon; Y L Kim; D K Cho
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Percutaneous femoral puncture for endovascular treatment of occlusive arterial lesions.

Authors:  F J Criado; M Twena; M Halsted; O Abul-Khoudoud
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Immediate sealing of arterial puncture sites after cardiac catheterization and coronary angioplasty using a biodegradable collagen plug: results of an international registry.

Authors:  S M Ernst; R M Tjonjoegin; R Schräder; M Kaltenbach; U Sigwart; T A Sanborn; H W Plokker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Retroperitoneal hematoma following femoral arterial catheterization: a serious and often fatal complication.

Authors:  S Sreeram; A B Lumsden; J S Miller; A A Salam; T F Dodson; R B Smith
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Sonographically guided antegrade common femoral artery access.

Authors:  Kee-Min Yeow; Cheng-Hong Toh; Cheng-Hesion Wu; Rui-Ying Lee; Hung-Chang Hsieh; Chi-Ting Liau; Hao-Jui Li
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Pseudoaneurysm: a complication of faulty technique in femoral arterial puncture.

Authors:  S Rapoport; K W Sniderman; S S Morse; M H Proto; G R Ross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  15 in total

1.  The effect of skin entry site, needle angulation and soft tissue compression on simulated antegrade and retrograde femoral arterial punctures: an anatomical study using Cartesian co-ordinates derived from CT angiography.

Authors:  Matthew D B S Tam; Mark Lewis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Echocardiographic guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic percutaneous procedures.

Authors:  Cam Tu Nguyen; Eunice Lee; Huai Luo; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ariel L Shiloh; Lewis A Eisen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?

Authors:  Iacopo Barbetta; Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Ultrasonography-guided radial artery catheterization and further optimal sequences.

Authors:  Yushi U Adachi; Atsushi Numaguchi; Naoyuki Matsuda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Effectiveness of a strategy to reduce major vascular complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Fnu Abhishek; Edwin Kevin Heist; Conor Barrett; Stephan Danik; Dan Blendea; Christina Correnti; Zaka Khan; Jeremy N Ruskin; Moussa Mansour
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Routine Ultrasonography Guidance for Femoral Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures: The UNIVERSAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Sulaiman AlRashidi; Marc-André d'Entremont; Omar Alansari; Bradley Brochu; Laura Heenan; Elizabeth Skuriat; Jessica Tyrwhitt; Michael Raco; Michael Tsang; Nicholas Valettas; James L Velianou; Tej Sheth; Matthew Sibbald; Shamir R Mehta; Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri; Jon David Schwalm; Madhu K Natarajan; Andrew Kelly; Elie Akl; Sarah Tawadros; Mercedes Camargo; Walaa Faidi; John Bauer; Rachel Moxham; James Nkurunziza; Gustavo Dutra; Jose Winter
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 30.154

Review 8.  Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults.

Authors:  Ronald Lg Flumignan; Virginia Fm Trevisani; Renato D Lopes; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Luis Cu Nakano
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-12

9.  Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance and Conventional Method for Common Femoral Artery Cannulation: A Prospective Study of 939 Patients.

Authors:  Mahmut Tuna Katırcıbaşı; Hakan Güneş; Ahmet Çağrı Aykan; Ekrem Aksu; Sami Özgül
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.672

10.  Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access?

Authors:  Andrew R Bodenham
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.