Literature DB >> 1576495

Experimental study of the protective effect of intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping in the rat.

H Isozaki1, R Adam, M Gigou, A M Szekely, M Shen, H Bismuth.   

Abstract

The tolerance of the liver to ischaemia during intermittent clamping of the hepatic pedicle was compared with that during a continuous Pringle manoeuvre. Three groups of rats undergoing total durations of clamping of 60, 90 and 120 min were studied. A temporary peroperative portacaval shunt was used to exclude the effects of splanchnic venous stasis and allow independent study of the effects of hepatic ischaemia. In each group, three methods of portal clamping were evaluated: a continuous Pringle manoeuvre (n = 10), a 30-min intermittent clamping (n = 10) and a 15-min intermittent clamping (n = 10). The clamp release time between the periods of liver ischaemia was 5 min. Survival at day 7 and postoperative changes in liver function (transaminase enzymes, bilirubin, bromsulphthalein elimination, liver adenosine 5'-triphosphate levels) were recorded. Intermittent clamping of the pedicle was tolerated significantly better than continuous clamping. This method optimizes the ability of the liver to tolerate extended periods of ischaemia. For a given duration of ischaemia, no additional improvement could be produced by shortening the intermittent clamping period from 30 to 15 min. These data suggest that, when the Pringle manoeuvre is used, it should be applied intermittently rather than continuously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1576495     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  13 in total

Review 1.  Organ preconditioning: the past, current status, and related lung studies.

Authors:  Shi-ping Luh; Pan-chyr Yang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and intermittent and continuous inflow occlusion in the murine liver.

Authors:  Hannes A Rüdiger; Koo J Kang; David Sindram; Hans M Riehle; Pierre A Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Protective effects of ischemic preconditioning for liver resection performed under inflow occlusion in humans.

Authors:  P A Clavien; S Yadav; D Sindram; R C Bentley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Intermittent clamping is superior to ischemic preconditioning and its effect is more marked with shorter clamping cycles in the rat liver.

Authors:  Yasuji Seyama; Hiroshi Imamura; Yoshinori Inagaki; Yutaka Matsuyama; Wei Tang; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Prolonged continuous or intermittent vascular inflow occlusion during hemihepatectomy in pigs.

Authors:  B A van Wagensveld; T M van Gulik; H C Gelderblom; J J Scheepers; A Bosma; E Endert; D J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study.

Authors:  J Belghiti; R Noun; R Malafosse; P Jagot; A Sauvanet; F Pierangeli; J Marty; O Farges
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Role of ischemic preconditioning in liver surgery and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  Eduardo E Montalvo-Jave; Enrique Piña; Cesar Montalvo-Arenas; Raúl Urrutia; Luis Benavente-Chenhalls; Julieta Peña-Sanchez; David A Geller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The protective effect of thromboxane A2 synthetase inhibitor against ischemic liver injury.

Authors:  H Isozaki; K Okajima; H Hara; M Kobayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Markus Selzner; Hannes A Rüdiger; Rolf Graf; Zakiyah Kadry; Valentin Rousson; Wolfram Jochum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Blocking intrahepatic inflow and backflow using Chang's needle during hepatic resection: Chang's maneuver.

Authors:  Y C Chang; N Nagasue
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.