Literature DB >> 10077050

Prolonged continuous or intermittent vascular inflow occlusion during hemihepatectomy in pigs.

B A van Wagensveld1, T M van Gulik, H C Gelderblom, J J Scheepers, A Bosma, E Endert, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury in a hemihepatectomy model in pigs after prolonged continuous or intermittent vascular inflow occlusion in the liver. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Massive intraoperative blood loss during liver resections can be prevented by temporary vascular inflow occlusion, consequently leading to ischemia and reperfusion injury in the remnant liver. Previously, in a pig liver resection model in which only limited I/R injury was induced during brief (90 min) vascular inflow occlusion, the authors demonstrated reduced I/R injury after continuous (CNT) occlusion, compared to intermittent (INT). This liver resection study on pigs was undertaken to assess I/R injury after prolonged (120 min) CNT or INT occlusion.
METHODS: In pigs (37.0 +/- 1.5 kg), liver ischemia during 2 hours was CNT (n = 6) or INT (n = 6) (eight subsequent periods of 12 min ischemia and 3 min recirculation), followed by 6 hours of reperfusion. A left hemihepatectomy (45.5% +/- 1.4%) was performed within the first 12 minutes of ischemia. No hepatic pedicle clamping or liver resection was performed in control experiments (n = 6). Microvascular damage was assessed by hyaluronic acid (HA) uptake capacity of the liver (parameter of early sinusoidal endothelial cell damage) and restoration of intrahepatic tissue pO2 during reperfusion. Hepatocellular damage was tested by plasma concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).
RESULTS: Hyaluronic acid uptake after 6 hours of reperfusion, compared to preischemic uptake, was unaltered in the control group, but was significantly reduced in both resection groups. However, more HA was taken up after INT occlusion, compared to CNT (60.4% +/- 5.6% and 39.5% +/- 3.7%, respectively; ANOVA: p = 0.001). Intrahepatic tissue pO2 distribution after 6 hours of reperfusion more closely returned to preischemic configuration in the INT group than in the CNT group, indicating reduced microcirculatory disturbances after INT occlusion. Release of AST and LDH after 6 hours of reperfusion was significantly increased in both CNT and INT groups. Lower AST levels, however, were found after INT occlusion than after CNT occlusion (267.0 +/- 74.7 U/l and 603.3 +/- 132.4 U/l, respectively; p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent hepatic vascular inflow occlusion during prolonged liver ischemia in pigs resulted in less microcirculatory and hepatocellular injury, compared to continuous occlusion. Intermittent clamping is preferable when prolonged periods of vascular inflow occlusion are applied during liver resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10077050      PMCID: PMC1191703          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

1.  Vascular occlusions for liver resections. Operative management and tolerance to hepatic ischemia: 142 cases.

Authors:  E Delva; Y Camus; B Nordlinger; L Hannoun; R Parc; H Deriaz; A Lienhart; C Huguet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Effluent levels of hyaluronic acid can predict ultimate graft outcome after clinical liver transplantation: a prospective series.

Authors:  O L Bronsther; P N Rao; A Pinna; J Snyder; S Cowan; D Kramer; S Takaya; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Isolated perfused rat liver technique.

Authors:  D K Meijer; K Keulemans; G J Mulder
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Determination of the hepatic elimination capacity (Lm) of galactose by single injection.

Authors:  N Tygstrup
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl       Date:  1966

5.  Sinusoidal lining cell damage: the critical injury in cold preservation of liver allografts in the rat.

Authors:  C M McKeown; V Edwards; M J Phillips; P R Harvey; C N Petrunka; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Ischemic injury in liver transplantation: difference in injury sites between warm and cold ischemia in rats.

Authors:  T Ikeda; K Yanaga; K Kishikawa; S Kakizoe; M Shimada; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Intrahepatic tissue pO2 during continuous or intermittent vascular inflow occlusion in a pig liver resection model.

Authors:  B A van Wagensveld; T M van Gulik; E E Gabeler; A J van der Kleij; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.745

8.  Hepatic microcirculatory perfusion failure is a determinant of liver dysfunction in warm ischemia-reperfusion.

Authors:  B Vollmar; J Glasz; R Leiderer; S Post; M D Menger
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  An experimental study of survival after two hours of normothermic hepatic ischemia.

Authors:  B Nordlinger; D Douvin; L Javaudin; P Bloch; A Aranda; M Boschat; C Huguet
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-06

10.  Prolonged intermittent clamping of the portal triad during hepatectomy.

Authors:  D Elias; E Desruennes; P Lasser
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  15 in total

1.  Outcome using hemihepatic vascular occlusion versus the pringle maneuver in resections limited to one hepatic section or less.

Authors:  Kuniya Tanaka; Hiroshi Shimada; Shinji Togo; Yasuhiko Nagano; Itaru Endo; Hitoshi Sekido
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders at the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  D J Gouma; H Obertop
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Safe upper limit of intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion for liver resection in cirrhotic rats.

Authors:  D X Lei; C H Peng; S Y Peng; X C Jiang; Y L Wu; H W Shen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  How much ischemia can the liver tolerate during resection?

Authors:  Wouter G van Riel; Rowan F van Golen; Megan J Reiniers; Michal Heger; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and intermittent and continuous inflow occlusion in the murine liver.

Authors:  Hannes A Rüdiger; Koo J Kang; David Sindram; Hans M Riehle; Pierre A Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Ischemic preconditioning versus intermittent vascular inflow control during major liver resection in pigs.

Authors:  Vassilios Smyrniotis; Georgia Kostopanagiotou; Kassiani Theodoraki; Charalampos Farantos; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Evangelos Gamaletsos; Agathi Condi-Paphitis; Alexis Fotopoulos; Panagiotis Dimakakos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Ischemic preconditioning-induced hyperperfusion correlates with hepatoprotection after liver resection.

Authors:  Oleg Heizmann; Georgios Meimarakis; Andreas Volk; Daniel Matz; Daniel Oertli; Rolf J Schauer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Intermittent clamping is superior to ischemic preconditioning and its effect is more marked with shorter clamping cycles in the rat liver.

Authors:  Yasuji Seyama; Hiroshi Imamura; Yoshinori Inagaki; Yutaka Matsuyama; Wei Tang; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Mild hypothermia protects liver against ischemia and reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Cheng-You Wang; Yong Ni; Yan Liu; Zhi-Heng Huang; Min-Jie Zhang; Yong-Qiang Zhan; Hai-Bin Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Hepatic resections using a water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device: a new technology for safer surgery.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Francesco Barbagallo; Adriana Toro; Maria Sofia; Tommaso Guastella; Ferdinando Latteri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.