Literature DB >> 15764536

Evaluation of potential toxicity from co-exposure to three CNS depressants (toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) under resting and working conditions using PBPK modeling.

James E Dennison1, Philip L Bigelow, Moiz M Mumtaz, Melvin E Andersen, Ivan D Dobrev, Raymond S H Yang.   

Abstract

Under OSHA and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) guidelines, the mixture formula (unity calculation) provides a method for evaluating exposures to mixtures of chemicals that cause similar toxicities. According to the formula, if exposures are reduced in proportion to the number of chemicals and their respective exposure limits, the overall exposure is acceptable. This approach assumes that responses are additive, which is not the case when pharmacokinetic interactions occur. To determine the validity of the additivity assumption, we performed unity calculations for a variety of exposures to toluene, ethylbenzene, and/or xylene using the concentration of each chemical in blood in the calculation instead of the inhaled concentration. The blood concentrations were predicted using a validated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to allow exploration of a variety of exposure scenarios. In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and ACGIH occupational exposure limits were largely based on studies of humans or animals that were resting during exposure. The PBPK model was also used to determine the increased concentration of chemicals in the blood when employees were exercising or performing manual work. At rest, a modest overexposure occurs due to pharmacokinetic interactions when exposure is equal to levels where a unity calculation is 1.0 based on threshold limit values (TLVs). Under work load, however, internal exposure was 87%higher than provided by the TLVs. When exposures were controlled by a unity calculation based on permissible exposure limits (PELs), internal exposure was 2.9 and 4.6 times the exposures at the TLVs at rest and workload, respectively. If exposure was equal to PELs outright, internal exposure was 12.5 and 16 times the exposure at the TLVs at rest and workload, respectively. These analyses indicate the importance of (1) selecting appropriate exposure limits, (2) performing unity calculations, and (3) considering the effect of work load on internal doses, and they illustrate the utility of PBPK modeling in occupational health risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15764536     DOI: 10.1080/15459620590916198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  10 in total

1.  Exploring Mechanistic Toxicity of Mixtures Using PBPK Modeling and Computational Systems Biology.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz; Claude Emond; Evad D McLanahan; Shivanjali Joshi-Barr; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Mold and Human Health: a Reality Check.

Authors:  Andrea T Borchers; Christopher Chang; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Cancer Risk Assessment for Workers Exposed to Pollution Source, a Petrochemical Company, Iran.

Authors:  Bahram Harati; Seyed Jamaleddin Shahtaheri; Hossein Ali Yousefi; Ali Harati; Ali Askari; Nabi Abdolmohamadi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 4.  Considering the cumulative risk of mixtures of chemicals - a challenge for policy makers.

Authors:  Denis A Sarigiannis; Ute Hansen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Translational research to develop a human PBPK models tool kit-volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Authors:  M Moiz Mumtaz; Meredith Ray; Susan R Crowell; Deborah Keys; Jeffrey Fisher; Patricia Ruiz
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

Review 6.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: methodology, applications, and limitations with a focus on its role in pediatric drug development.

Authors:  Feras Khalil; Stephanie Läer
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-01

Review 7.  Evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with computational models in supporting cumulative risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Harvey Clewell; Jerry Campbell; Melvin Andersen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Moiz Mumtaz; Jeffrey Fisher; Benjamin Blount; Patricia Ruiz
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-03-19

9.  Migration of BTEX and phthalates from natural rubber latex balloons obtained from the Sri Lankan market.

Authors:  Imanda Jayawardena; Pahan I Godakumbura; M A B Prashantha
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  Aggregate Exposure and Cumulative Risk Assessment--Integrating Occupational and Non-occupational Risk Factors.

Authors:  T J Lentz; G S Dotson; P R D Williams; A Maier; B Gadagbui; S P Pandalai; A Lamba; F Hearl; M Mumtaz
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.