Literature DB >> 15763572

Sugar-dependent rats show enhanced responding for sugar after abstinence: evidence of a sugar deprivation effect.

Nicole M Avena1, Kristin A Long, Bartley G Hoebel.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that intermittent sugar availability (12 h/day) produces signs of dependence in rats, including escalation of intake, mu-opioid and dopamine receptor changes, behavioral and neurochemical indices of withdrawal, and cross-sensitization with amphetamine. "Deprivation-effect" paradigms, whereby abstinence from a substance results in enhanced intake, are often used to measure "craving" for drugs of abuse, such as alcohol. The present study used operant conditioning to investigate consumption of sugar after abstinence in rats selected for glucose avidity. The experimental group was trained on a fixed ratio (FR-1) schedule for 25% glucose for 30 min/day for 28 days and also had glucose access in the home cages for an additional 11.5 h daily. The control group had only the 30-min/day access to glucose in the operant chambers. Then, both groups were deprived of glucose for 2 weeks. After this period of abstinence, animals were put back in the operant chambers. The experimental group responded significantly more than ever before, and significantly more than the control group. In conclusion, daily 12-h access to sugar, in the paradigm used, can result in an altered neural state that lasts throughout 2 weeks of abstinence, leading to enhanced intake. Together with previous results, this deprivation effect supports the theory that animals may become dependent on sugar under selected dietary circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15763572     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  57 in total

1.  Novel cues reinstate cocaine-seeking behavior and induce Fos protein expression as effectively as conditioned cues.

Authors:  Ryan M Bastle; Peter R Kufahl; Mari N Turk; Suzanne M Weber; Nathan S Pentkowski; Kenneth J Thiel; Janet L Neisewander
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  The dark side of food addiction.

Authors:  Sarah L Parylak; George F Koob; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-08

Review 3.  Natural rewards, neuroplasticity, and non-drug addictions.

Authors:  Christopher M Olsen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Food and addiction among the ageing population.

Authors:  Susan Murray; Cindy Kroll; Nicole M Avena
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 10.895

Review 5.  Obesity and the neurocognitive basis of food reward and the control of intake.

Authors:  Hisham Ziauddeen; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; James O Hill; Michael Kelley; Naiman A Khan
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  Sugar and fat bingeing have notable differences in addictive-like behavior.

Authors:  Nicole M Avena; Pedro Rada; Bartley G Hoebel
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Animal models of excessive alcohol consumption: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Howard C Becker; Dorit Ron
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.405

8.  Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Access conditions affect binge-type shortening consumption in rats.

Authors:  F H E Wojnicki; D S Johnson; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-09-26

Review 10.  Gain weight by "going diet?" Artificial sweeteners and the neurobiology of sugar cravings: Neuroscience 2010.

Authors:  Qing Yang
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2010-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.