Literature DB >> 15762971

Prospective randomized comparison of single-dose versus 1-day cefazolin for prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery.

Her-Young Su1, Dah-Ching Ding, Da-Chung Chen, Mei-Fen Lu, Jah-Yao Liu, Feng-Yee Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of single-dose versus 1-day cefazolin prophylaxis for the prevention of postoperative gynecologic infections.
METHODS: From June 2001 to January 2003, 548 patients were randomized to receive either single-dose (1 g of cefazolin intravenously before surgery, 273 patients) or 1-day cefazolin (1 g intravenously before surgery and three more doses every 6 hr after surgery, 275 patients) prophylaxis.
RESULTS: A total of 531 (267 patients in the single-dose group and 264 in the 1-day group) completed the study. Only one of 267 (0.37%) patients in the single-dose group developed a trocar wound infection and one of 264 (0.37%) patients in the 1-day group developed a vaginal cuff infection. Had a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics been administered to all patients, the antibiotic cost would have been reduced by 75-80%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of single-dose preoperative cefazolin prophylaxis was as effective as four doses of cefazolin for preventing serious infectious morbidity among our patients. Shortening the duration of antibiotics prophylaxis also reduced medical costs and microorganism resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15762971     DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00583.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Audit of quality of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  Salih Hosoglu; Selda Aslan; Serife Akalin; Vuslat Bosnak
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-11-26

2.  Effectiveness of an information technology intervention to improve prophylactic antibacterial use in the postoperative period.

Authors:  Kevin Haynes; Darren R Linkin; Neil O Fishman; Warren B Bilker; Brian L Strom; Eric A Pifer; Sean Hennessy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis].

Authors:  F Reutter; D A Reuter; H Hilgarth; A M Heilek; M S Goepfert; M A Punke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Review of information technology for surgical patient care.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Hannah Huth; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  The clinical effects of antibiotic prophylaxis for hysteroscopic procedures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Guo; Ni Zeng; Jian Yang; Ping Wu; Pengpeng Liu; Zhisu Liu; Jun Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  The Effect of Different Antibiotic Regimens on Bacterial Resistance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Romeo Patini; Gilda Mangino; Leonardo Martellacci; Gianluca Quaranta; Luca Masucci; Patrizia Gallenzi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08

7.  Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence?

Authors:  Lucas Borges Pereira; Cinara Silva Feliciano; Diego Silva Siqueira; Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues; Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.