PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of atrophy correction on the results of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the context of normal aging. METHODS: Before the human study was performed, a Hoffman 3D brain phantom experiment was carried out in order to validate a newly developed correction method for partial volume effects (PVEs). Brain FDG PET was then performed in 139 healthy Japanese volunteers (71 men, 68 women; age 24-81 years). PET images were corrected for PVEs using grey matter volume, which was segmented from co-registered magnetic resonance images and convoluted with the spatial resolution of the PET scanner. We investigated the correlation between advancing age and relative regional FDG activity, which was normalised to the global activity before and after PVE correction using Statistical Parametric Mapping 99. RESULTS: The PET image, when corrected for PVEs, provided more homogeneous tracer distribution in the whole phantom than in the original PET image. The human PET study of both sexes revealed significant negative correlations between age and relative FDG activity in the bilateral perisylvian and medial frontal areas before PVE correction. However, these negative correlations were largely resolved after PVE correction. CONCLUSION: Correction for PVEs was effective in our FDG PET study. The reduction in FDG uptake with advancing age that was detected by FDG PET without PVE correction could be accounted for largely by an age-related cerebral volume loss in the bilateral perisylvian and medial frontal areas.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of atrophy correction on the results of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the context of normal aging. METHODS: Before the human study was performed, a Hoffman 3D brain phantom experiment was carried out in order to validate a newly developed correction method for partial volume effects (PVEs). Brain FDG PET was then performed in 139 healthy Japanese volunteers (71 men, 68 women; age 24-81 years). PET images were corrected for PVEs using grey matter volume, which was segmented from co-registered magnetic resonance images and convoluted with the spatial resolution of the PET scanner. We investigated the correlation between advancing age and relative regional FDG activity, which was normalised to the global activity before and after PVE correction using Statistical Parametric Mapping 99. RESULTS: The PET image, when corrected for PVEs, provided more homogeneous tracer distribution in the whole phantom than in the original PET image. The human PET study of both sexes revealed significant negative correlations between age and relative FDG activity in the bilateral perisylvian and medial frontal areas before PVE correction. However, these negative correlations were largely resolved after PVE correction. CONCLUSION: Correction for PVEs was effective in our FDG PET study. The reduction in FDG uptake with advancing age that was detected by FDG PET without PVE correction could be accounted for largely by an age-related cerebral volume loss in the bilateral perisylvian and medial frontal areas.
Authors: M Bentourkia; A Bol; A Ivanoiu; D Labar; M Sibomana; A Coppens; C Michel; G Cosnard; A G De Volder Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: K Herholz; E Salmon; D Perani; J C Baron; V Holthoff; L Frölich; P Schönknecht; K Ito; R Mielke; E Kalbe; G Zündorf; X Delbeuck; O Pelati; D Anchisi; F Fazio; N Kerrouche; B Desgranges; F Eustache; B Beuthien-Baumann; C Menzel; J Schröder; T Kato; Y Arahata; M Henze; W D Heiss Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: V Ibáñez; P Pietrini; G E Alexander; M L Furey; D Teichberg; J C Rajapakse; S I Rapoport; M B Schapiro; B Horwitz Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: P K Curiati; J H Tamashiro-Duran; F L S Duran; C A Buchpiguel; P Squarzoni; D C Romano; H Vallada; P R Menezes; M Scazufca; G F Busatto; T C T F Alves Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Peter Kochunov; Jean-François Mangin; Thomas Coyle; Jack Lancaster; Paul Thompson; Dennis Rivière; Yann Cointepas; Jean Régis; Anita Schlosser; Don R Royall; Karl Zilles; John Mazziotta; Arthur Toga; Peter T Fox Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: José V Pardo; Joel T Lee; Sohail A Sheikh; Christa Surerus-Johnson; Hemant Shah; Kristin R Munch; John V Carlis; Scott M Lewis; Michael A Kuskowski; Maurice W Dysken Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ann M Peiffer; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Joseph A Maldjian; Ramon Casanova; Ryali Srikanth; Satoru Hayasaka; Jonathan H Burdette; Robert A Kraft; Paul J Laurienti Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Douglas N Greve; David H Salat; Spencer L Bowen; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Aaron P Schultz; Ciprian Catana; J Alex Becker; Claus Svarer; Gitte M Knudsen; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 6.556