Literature DB >> 15758704

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Edouard J Trabulsi1, Bertrand Guillonneau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: After the pioneering period when only few teams were performing the procedure, the laparoscopic approach to radical prostatectomy has become widespread with several technical variations. A comprehensive review of the published literature on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed to determine the current state of the art of this surgical innovation in terms of perioperative parameters, functional results and cancer control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: English language, peer reviewed articles published before June 2004 concerning laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were found by MEDLINE query. All articles were analyzed and none were a priori excluded. Conclusions were drawn from series of 50 or more patients.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is being performed at multiple centers worldwide using various surgical approaches and technologies. Analysis of perioperative parameters, including surgical blood loss, operative time, complications and convalescence, demonstrated low morbidity and showed a clear trend toward improvement with increased experience. The reported positive surgical margin rates were lower in more recent series. As measured by prostate specific antigen recurrence and disease-free intervals, oncological results and cancer control rates are difficult to ascertain in the immature series published to date. Functional results in terms of postoperative urinary and sexual function appear encouraging.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall the current operative, oncological and functional results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy appear to approximate those of open radical retropubic prostatectomy. These results justify the considerable interest of the urological community in laparoscopy, as evidenced by its widespread application. Nevertheless, longer followup and more mature data are needed definitively to establish laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as an alternative to the retropubic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15758704     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154970.63147.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.

Authors:  Tomonori Habuchi; Toshiro Terachi; Hiromitsu Mimata; Yukihiro Kondo; Hiroomi Kanayama; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Kikuo Nutahara; Tsuneharu Miki; Yoshinari Ono; Shiro Baba; Seiji Naito; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience.

Authors:  P J O'Malley; S Van Appledorn; D M Bouchier-Hayes; H Crowe; A J Costello
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Ke-Bing Wang; Xiao-Yong Pu; Xiang-Fu Zhou; Jian-Guang Qiu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Urethtral approach in retroperitoneoscopic radical prostatectomy: a novel technique for safe prostate dissection.

Authors:  Tetsuo Nozaki; Akihiro Morii; Yasuyoshi Fujiuchi; Hideki Fuse
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-10-30

7.  Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Elcio Silva; Ubirajara Ferreira; Gustavo D Silva; Mirandolino B Mariano; Nelson R Netto; Athanase Billis; Luis A Magna
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Prevention and management of ureteral injuries occurring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Heilbronn experience and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Ali Serdar Gözen; Joanne Cresswell; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Faruk Yencilek; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Management of complications of prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  M Dror Michaelson; Shane E Cotter; Patricio C Gargollo; Anthony L Zietman; Douglas M Dahl; Matthew R Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  [Radical transurethral resection of the prostate. An alternative therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M A Reuter; K Dietz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.