Literature DB >> 15758525

Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton.

Y Jiang1, J Zhao, D L White, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Quantitative assessment of three-dimensional (3D) trabecular structural characteristics may improve our ability to understand the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, to test the efficacy of pharmaceutical intervention, and to estimate bone biomechanical properties. Considerable progress has been made in advanced imaging techniques for noninvasive and/or nondestructive assessment of 3D trabecular structure and connectivity. Micro computed tomography (microCT) has been used to measure 3D trabecular bone structure in rats, both in vivo and in vitro. It can directly quantify 3D trabecular bone structure such as trabecular volume, trabecular thickness, number, separation, structure model index, degree of anisotropy, and connectivity, in a model-independent manner. We have used microCT to study ovariectomy (OVX) induced osteopenia in rats and its treatment with agents such as estrogen, and sodium fluoride. We have demonstrated that 3D microCT can quantify mouse trabecular and cortical bone structure with an isotropic resolution of 9 microm(3). It is also useful for studying osteoporosis in mice and in phenotypes of transgenic mice or gene knockout mice. MicroCT can be used to quantify osteogenesis in mouse Ilizarov leg lengthening procedures, to quantify osteoconduction in a rat cranial defect model, and to quantify cortical bone porosity. Recently, microCT using high intensity and tight collimation synchrotron radiation to achieve spatial resolution of 1-2 microm has provided the capability to assess additional features such as resorption cavities. Unlike microCT, micro magnetic resonance imaging (IMRI) is nonionizing. Recently, the ability of microMRI to assess osteoporosis in animal models has been explored. Using a small, high-efficiency coil in a high-field imager, microMRI can give resolutions sufficient to discriminate individual trabeculae. We have shown that, with appropriate settings, it is possible to image trabecular bone in rats in vivo and in vitro. In our study of OVX rats, analysis of microMR images can demonstrate differences in rat trabecular bone that are not detected by DXA measurements. In a rabbit OA model, with the OA induced by meniscectomy or anterior cruciate ligament transection, MRI shows decreased cartilage thickness, subchondral osteosclerosis and osteophytes, while radiographs can only show subchondral osteosclerosis and osteophytes could not be found. Advanced imaging methods are able to measure 3D trabecular structure and connectivity in arbitrary orientations in a highly automated, objective, non-user-specific manner, allowing greater numbers of samples for unbiased comparisons between controls and the disordered or treated. They can be utilized on a large sample leading to fewer sampling errors. They are non-destructive allowing multiple tests such as biomechanical testing and chemical analysis on the same sample; and non-invasive permitting longitudinal studies and reducing the number of animals needed.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 15758525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


  22 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?

Authors:  D M L Cooper; C E Kawalilak; K Harrison; B D Johnston; J D Johnston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin.

Authors:  Kun Lv; Song Gao
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  [Feasibility of flat-panel volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT) in experimental small animal imaging of osteoporosis - initial experience].

Authors:  R Valencia; E K Stuermer; C Dullin; K P Herrmann; I Kluever; A Zaroban; S Sehmisch; M Funke; F Knollmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  The effect of NELL1 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on calvarial bone regeneration.

Authors:  Tara Aghaloo; Catherine M Cowan; Xinli Zhang; Earl Freymiller; Chia Soo; Benjamin Wu; Kang Ting; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  MicroCT morphometry analysis of mouse cancellous bone: intra- and inter-system reproducibility.

Authors:  K Verdelis; L Lukashova; E Atti; P Mayer-Kuckuk; M G E Peterson; S Tetradis; A L Boskey; M C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Multiscale investigation on the effects of additional weight bearing in combination with low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on bone quality of growing female rats.

Authors:  Tianlong Zhang; Jiazi Gao; Juan Fang; He Gong
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Changes in intracortical microporosities induced by pharmaceutical treatment of osteoporosis as detected by high resolution micro-CT.

Authors:  Steven M Tommasini; Andrea Trinward; Alvin S Acerbo; Francesco De Carlo; Lisa M Miller; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone microstructure and its associated genetic variability in 12 inbred mouse strains: microCT study and in silico genome scan.

Authors:  Ilya Sabsovich; J David Clark; Guochun Liao; Gary Peltz; Derek P Lindsey; Christopher R Jacobs; Wei Yao; Tian-Zhi Guo; Wade S Kingery
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  PET Imaging of Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Gang Niu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.