Literature DB >> 15758094

The relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the intensity of milk production in Ireland.

J W Casey1, N M Holden.   

Abstract

European Union agri-environmental schemes aim to reduce the environmental impact of agricultural production, but were developed before consideration of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Life cycle assessment methodology provided a framework for comparing emissions as kg CO2 equivalent per kg of energy corrected milk (ECM) (kg CO2 kg(-1) ECM yr(-1)) and per hectare (kg CO2 ha(-1) yr(-1)) for farms both within and outside the Irish agri-environmental scheme. The agri-environmental scheme farms operate extensive systems from 40 to 120 cows producing between 3032 and 5946 kg ECM cow(-1) lactation(-1). The cows are fed on grass, conserved silage, and concentrates. Supplementation ranged between 250 and 620 kg cow(-1) yr(-1). The conventional farms had between 30 and 77 milking cows producing 4736 to 6944 kg ECM cow(-1) lactation(-1). Supplementation ranged from 400 to 1000 kg cow(-1) yr(-1). The emissions from each unit were estimated using published emissions factors and possible error was evaluated by using ranges for each factor. Calculated emissions ranged from 0.92 to 1.51 kg CO2 kg(-1) ECM yr(-1) and 5924 to 8323 kg CO2 ha(-1). On average, total emissions from conventional farms were around 18% (p = 0.01) greater than the agri-environmental scheme farms and emissions per hectare (total area required) were 17% greater (p = 0.02) but there was no significant difference (p = 0.335) in terms of emission per unit milk produced. To evaluate greenhouse gas emissions for each farm in terms of the system intensity it was necessary to define a measure of intensification and area per liter of milk produced that was best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15758094     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  9 in total

1.  Nutritional and ecological evaluation of dairy farming systems based on concentrate feeding regimes in semi-arid environments of Jordan.

Authors:  Othman Alqaisi; Torsten Hemme; Martin Hagemann; Andreas Susenbeth
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  Are the dietary guidelines for meat, fat, fruit and vegetable consumption appropriate for environmental sustainability? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian John Reynolds; Jonathan David Buckley; Philip Weinstein; John Boland
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  The Relationship of Dairy Farm Eco-Efficiency with Intensification and Self-Sufficiency. Evidence from the French Dairy Sector Using Life Cycle Analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling.

Authors:  Andreas Diomedes Soteriades; Alistair William Stott; Sindy Moreau; Thierry Charroin; Melanie Blanchard; Jiayi Liu; Philippe Faverdin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Paradox in Bacterial Pathogenesis: Activation of the Local Macrophage Inflammasome Is Required for Virulence of Streptococcus uberis.

Authors:  Nathan Archer; Sharon A Egan; Tracey J Coffey; Richard D Emes; M Filippa Addis; Philip N Ward; Adam M Blanchard; James A Leigh
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-11-28

5.  Environmental life cycle assessment of cow milk in a conventional semi-intensive Brazilian production system.

Authors:  Laurine Santos Carvalho; Camila Daniele Willers; Bruna Borges Soares; Alex Rodrigues Nogueira; José Adolfo de Almeida Neto; Luciano Brito Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 6.  Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.

Authors:  Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 13.211

7.  Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment.

Authors:  S A Ross; C F E Topp; R A Ennos; M G G Chagunda
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Benefits and Trade-Offs of Dairy System Changes Aimed at Reducing Nitrate Leaching.

Authors:  Pierre Beukes; Alvaro Romera; Kathryn Hutchinson; Tony van der Weerden; Cecile de Klein; Dawn Dalley; David Chapman; Chris Glassey; Robyn Dynes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.

Authors:  Judith L Capper; Roger A Cady
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.