Literature DB >> 15757844

Partial visual feedback and spatial end-point accuracy of discrete aiming movements.

W A Spijkers1, P Lochner.   

Abstract

Five experiments are reported in which the effect of partial visual feedback on the accuracy of discrete target aiming was investigated. Visual feedback was manipulated through a spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. The length of the visual feedback interval was varied as a percentage of the instructed movement time. In Experiment 1, the length of the vision interval was manipulated symmetrically at the beginning- and end-phase of the movement, whereas in the remaining experiments, the vision time was varied with respect to the end-phase only. The variations at the end were examined for different distances (Experiment 2), different movement speeds at the same distance (Experiment 3), and in small interstep intervals (Experiment 4). A vision time of more than 150 ms at the end-phase of the movement enhanced aiming performance in all experiments. Longer vision times monotonously improved aiming accuracy; the fifth experiment showed that a vision time of about 275 ms was sufficient for near-perfect aiming. Furthermore, the significance of vision during the first phase of a movement was demonstrated again. The results of the five experiments pointed to shorter visuomotor processing times. To explain the beneficial effects of short vision times for aiming accuracy, we propose a model of visuomotor processing that is based on the stochastic optimized submovement model of Meyer, Abrams, Kornblum, Wright, and Smith (1988).

Year:  1994        PMID: 15757844     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  3 in total

1.  Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; Axel Thielscher; Angelika Peer; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jean-Pierre Bresciani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Online control of reach accuracy in mice.

Authors:  Matthew I Becker; Dylan J Calame; Julia Wrobel; Abigail L Person
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cortex-dependent corrections as the tongue reaches for and misses targets.

Authors:  Tejapratap Bollu; Brendan S Ito; Samuel C Whitehead; Brian Kardon; James Redd; Mei Hong Liu; Jesse H Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 69.504

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.