Literature DB >> 15753744

A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients.

Jeffrey M Rothschild1, Carol A Keohane, E Francis Cook, E John Orav, Elisabeth Burdick, Sarah Thompson, Judy Hayes, David W Bates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous medications are vital during inpatient management. Errors associated with the administration of medications through intravenous infusion pumps to critically ill patients can result in adverse drug events. We sought to assess the impact of smart pumps with integrated decision support software on the incidence and nature of medication errors and adverse drug events.
DESIGN: We performed a prospective, randomized time-series trial and compared the serious medication error rate between intervention (decision support on) and control (decision support off) periods. Serious medication errors included both near-misses and preventable adverse drug events. Pump software produced log reports to help identify potential events. Events were presented to physicians for rating of event type, preventability, and severity.
SETTING: Cardiac surgical intensive care and step-down units between February and December 2002. PATIENTS: Pump data were available for 744 cardiac surgery admissions.
INTERVENTIONS: Decision support during medication administration provided feedback including alerts, reminders, and unit-specific drug rate limits.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We found a total of 180 serious medication errors, including 14 and 11 preventable adverse drug events and 73 and 82 nonintercepted potential adverse drug events in the control and intervention periods, respectively. The serious medication error rates in the control and intervention periods were 2.03 and 2.41 per 100 patient-pump-days, respectively (p = .124). We also found numerous opportunities for safety improvement. Violations of infusion practice during the intervention periods included 571 (25%) bypasses of the drug library. Medications were also frequently administered without documentation of physician orders in both periods (n = 823; 7.7%).
CONCLUSION: Intravenous medication errors and adverse drug events were frequent and could be detected using smart pumps. We found no measurable impact on the serious medication error rate, likely in part due to poor compliance. Although smart pumps have great promise, technological and nursing behavioral factors must be addressed if these pumps are to achieve their potential for improving medication safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15753744     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155912.73313.cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  50 in total

1.  Description and Evaluation of the Implementation of a Weight-Based, Nurse-Driven Heparin Nomogram in a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  James W Schurr; Craig A Stevens; Anne Bane; Carol Luppi; Sarah E Culbreth; Amy Leigh Miller; Jean M Connors; Katelyn W Sylvester
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 2.  Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult intensive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Manias; Allison Williams; Danny Liew
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  'Smart pumps' are not smart on their own.

Authors:  Matthew Grissinger
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-09

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Emmanuelle Delage; Julien Tourel; Brigitte Martin; Aurélie Guérin; Ahmed Moussa; Annie Lacroix; Denis Lebel; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

5.  Ad hoc versus standardized admixtures for continuous infusion drugs in neonatal intensive care: cognitive task analysis of safety at the bedside.

Authors:  Timothy S Brannon
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Adverse drug event detection in a community hospital utilising computerised medication and laboratory data.

Authors:  Andrew C Seger; Ashish K Jha; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Medication errors: the human factor.

Authors:  Edward Etchells; David Juurlink; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Medication errors in critical care: risk factors, prevention and disclosure.

Authors:  Eric Camiré; Eric Moyen; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Organizational and technological correlates of nurses' trust in a smart intravenous pump.

Authors:  Enid Montague; Onur Asan; Erin Chiou
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Evaluation of intravenous medication errors with smart infusion pumps in an academic medical center.

Authors:  Kumiko Ohashi; Patricia Dykes; Kathleen McIntosh; Elizabeth Buckley; Matt Wien; David W Bates
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.