Literature DB >> 15749799

Colonoscopy in the very old: why bother?

K K Y Yoong1, T Heymann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of colonoscopy in patients aged at least 85 years. Does the ideal of an ageism free service apply?
DESIGN: A retrospective audit.
SETTING: Department of gastroenterology that carries out about 1000 colonoscopies annually in a district general hospital serving a population of about 320 000.
SUBJECTS: All patients aged at least 85 years who underwent colonoscopy over five years to 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The indications for colonoscopy and its findings. The outcome of patients found to have colonic cancers.
RESULTS: Colonoscopy was completed in 219 cases (69%). The main reasons for failure were poor bowel preparation and severe diverticular disease. Normal findings occurred in 65 (30%) of the 219 cases that had had a complete examination. Colonoscopy identified a problem that explained the patient's symptoms in 116 (37%) cases. Polyps were found in 45 (14.2%) cases and malignancy in 28 (8.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The absence of significant complications and comparatively high yield of colonic malignancies and polyps reinforces the value of colonoscopy as a diagnostic tool even after 85 years of age and despite the technical challenges of the procedure in this age group that limited completion. Increasing age alone should not preclude a patient from colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749799      PMCID: PMC1743224          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.023374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  15 in total

1.  Fatal dysnatraemia caused by elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Carlos Ayus; Robert Levine; Allen I Arieff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

Review 2.  Recent developments in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Alex Ford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

3.  Fatal dysnatraemia caused by elective colonoscopy: additional cost for colonoscopy providers may be unnecessary.

Authors:  Timothy D Heymann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-24

4.  Colonoscopy in patients aged 80 years or older and its contribution to the evaluation of rectal bleeding.

Authors:  L Bat; A Pines; E Shemesh; Y Levo; D Zeeli; E Scapa; Y Rosenblum
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Randomized clinical trial of two colonoscopy preparation methods for elderly patients.

Authors:  B A Lashner; C S Winans; M O Blackstone
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.

Authors:  F A Macrae; K G Tan; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer: detection, treatment, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  J J DeCosse; G J Tsioulias; J S Jacobson
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Colonoscopy in the elderly. Low risk, high yield.

Authors:  T Ure; K Dehghan; A M Vernava; W E Longo; C A Andrus; G L Daniel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Esther K Wei; Edward Giovannucci; Kana Wu; Bernard Rosner; Charles S Fuchs; Walter C Willett; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged 75 years and older: risks, complications, and findings--a retrospective study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Lippert; Hans H Herfarth; Nicole Grunert; Esther Endlicher; Frank Klebl
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Passisd Laoveeravat; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Performing colonoscopy in elderly and very elderly patients: Risks, costs and benefits.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

4.  Colorectal cancer is reliably excluded in the frail and elderly population by minimal preparation CT.

Authors:  J H Saunders; D Miskovic; C Bowman; P Panto; A Menon
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Would you recommend screening colonoscopy for the very elderly?

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2014-10-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.