Literature DB >> 15748334

Shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal calculi.

Ryan F Paterson1, David A Lifshitz, Ramsay L Kuo, Tibério M Siqueira, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) remains the most common treatment for renal calculi. In this article, recent literature pertaining to ESWL monotherapy of renal calculi was reviewed, with the goal of improving ESWL results through better case selection. When selecting the optimal surgical approach for a patient, multiple factors must be considered. Factors to consider include stone-related factors (size, number, composition and location), renal anatomical factors, and patient-related factors. Each of these factors is presented in detail, with the discussion limit to non-staghorn renal calculi. Children, the elderly, patients with hypertension, and patients with impaired renal function, may be at increased risk of ESWL complications and adverse effects and care should be taken to limit the number and energy of shock waves applied in these special cases. Absolute contraindications to ESWL remain pregnancy, distal obstruction, untreated infection, and uncorrected coagulopathy.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15748334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  9 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 2.  The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei Lu; Zijie Wang; Rijin Song; Xiaolan Wang; Kai Qi; Qiying Dai; Wei Zhang; Min Gu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  J Klein; C Netsch; K D Sievert; A Miernik; J Westphal; H Leyh; T R W Herrmann; P Olbert; A Häcker; A Bachmann; R Homberg; M Schoenthaler; J Rassweiler; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Body mass index, body fat percentage, and the effect of body fat mass on SWL success.

Authors:  Ali Ferruh Akay; Abdullah Gedik; Ali Tutus; Hayrettin Sahin; Mehmet Kamuran Bircan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Pelvis Stones of 10-20 mm in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Babak Javanmard; Mohammad Reza Razaghi; Anahita Ansari Jafari; Mohammad Mohsen Mazloomfard
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 7.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Urolithiasis analysis in a multiethnic population at a tertiary hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Francis K Wathigo; Alfred Hayombe; Daniel Maina
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-04-20

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the ectopic pelvic kidney: Outcomes with the laser dusting technique.

Authors:  Nischith D'souza; Ashish Verma; Avinash Rai
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.