Literature DB >> 10889115

Incremental cost effectiveness of laser photocoagulation for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization.

G C Brown1, M M Brown, S Sharma, H Brown, W Tasman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a patient preference-based, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis for laser treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization.
DESIGN: Computer-based econometric modeling.
METHODS: The cost effectiveness of laser photocoagulation therapy was compared with the natural course of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. The model applied long-term visual data from previous clinical trials, utility analysis (which reflects patient perceptions of quality of life associated with a health state), decision analysis with Markov modeling, and the economic principles of present value analysis with discounting to account for the time value of money. DATABASE: Data from patients eligible for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization obtained by researchers in the Macular Photocoagulation Study were used for the analysis. INTERVENTION: Modeled laser therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovasacularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per quality-adjusted life-year ($/QALY gained) associated with laser therapy.
RESULTS: Laser photocoagulation therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, as compared with no treatment, resulted in a mean gain of 0.257 QALYs per treated patient. Using a yearly discount rate of 3% to account for the time value of money and inflation, the resultant $/QALY gained was $5629. Sensitivity analysis used in the cost-effectiveness analysis resulted in a $/QALY gained of $4974 with no gained discount rate and $11,633 with a yearly discount rate of 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: The incremental expense of laser therapy for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization appears to be highly cost effective. The result, which takes into account patient preference-based utility data, compares quite favorably with other interventional therapies across different medical specialties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10889115     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00169-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  The reproducibility of ophthalmic utility values.

Authors:  G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma; G Beauchamp; H Hollands
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

2.  Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients.

Authors:  S Sharma; G C Brown; M M Brown; H Hollands; R Robins; G K Shah
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A utility analysis correlation with visual acuity: methodologies and vision in the better and poorer eyes.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; A F Smith; J Landy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  Cost-Effectiveness Models in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Issues and Challenges.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Carolyn K Hulme-Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Value-based medicine and ophthalmology: an appraisal of cost-utility analyses.

Authors:  Gary C Brown; Melissa M Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Heidi Brown; Lindsay Smithen; David B Leeser; George Beauchamp
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 6.  [Value-based medicine in ophthalmology].

Authors:  C Hirneiss; A S Neubauer; C Tribus; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 7.  Economic cost of age-related macular degeneration: a review of recent research.

Authors:  Kathleen M Ke; Usha Chakravarthy; Ciaran O'Neill
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Quality of life and systemic comorbidities in patients with ophthalmic disease.

Authors:  Melissa M Brown; Gary C Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Hussein Hollands; Jennifer Landy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The goal of value-based medicine analyses: comparability. The case for neovascular macular degeneration.

Authors:  Gary C Brown; Melissa M Brown; Heidi C Brown; Sylvia Kindermann; Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

10.  Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Tavag Mrinalini; Paul P Lee; David W Hutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.