Literature DB >> 15747084

Evaluation of P-POSSUM in surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer and correlation of the predicted mortality with different surgical options.

Jensen T C Poon1, Bosco Chan, Wai Lun Law.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the accuracy of Portsmouth Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity system (P-POSSUM) in predicting the mortality of patients who underwent operations for obstructing colorectal cancer. It also is attempted to analyze the actual mortality and the predicted P-POSSUM mortality of different surgical options for obstructing left-sided cancer.
METHODS: Data on patients who underwent surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer during 1998 to 2002 were collected. Mortality predicted by P-POSSUM was compared to the actual mortality with the method of linear analysis. The accuracy of using P-POSSUM to predict mortality in this group of patients was assessed by Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test and Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis. The predicted and actual mortality of patients who underwent different surgical options also were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included in the study and 18 patients died postoperatively. The operative mortality was 11.3 percent. P-POSSUM predicted overall mortality of 15 percent. The observed and predicted mortality was found to have no significant lack of fit (chi-squared = 5.98; degree of freedom = 3; P = 0.11). The area under Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis was 0.75. For patients with left-sided tumors, P-POSSUM predicted mortality and actual mortality of patients who had resection without anastomosis were both significantly higher than patients with single-stage resection and primary anastomosis (P = 0.044 and 0.011, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: P-POSSUM system is valid for prediction of overall mortality in patients with operations for obstructing colorectal cancer. Estimation of P-POSSUM predicted mortality during operation and its ability to correlate with choice of procedure is an area that is worth further study in emergency colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15747084     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0766-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting mortality after oesophagogastric resections.

Authors:  J S Nagabhushan; S Srinath; F Weir; W J Angerson; B A Sugden; C G Morran
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction compared to surgery--a study of consecutive patients in a single institution.

Authors:  Eva Angenete; Dan Asplund; Maria Bergström; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prospective, controlled, randomized study of intraoperative colonic lavage versus stent placement in obstructive left-sided colonic cancer.

Authors:  M Alcántara; X Serra-Aracil; J Falcó; L Mora; J Bombardó; S Navarro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Ka Chun Ng; Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy W C Ho
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Colin Hewitt Richards; Fiona E Leitch; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Can SAPS II predict operative mortality more accurately than POSSUM and P-POSSUM in patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing resection?

Authors:  Mehmet F Can; Gohkan Yagci; Turgut Tufan; Erkan Ozturk; Nazif Zeybek; Sadettin Cetiner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Colorectal stenting as an effective therapy for preoperative and palliative treatment of large bowel obstruction: 9 years' experience.

Authors:  M Alcantara; X Serra; J Bombardó; J Falcó; J Perandreu; I Ayguavives; L Mora; R Hernando; S Navarro
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian M Blair; Erik B Lehman; Syed M Jafri; Matthew G Kaag; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Analysis of POSSUM score and postoperative morbidity in patients with rectal cancer undergoing surgery.

Authors:  V Valenti; J L Hernandez-Lizoain; J Baixauli; C Pastor; F Martinez-Regueira; J J Beunza; J J Aristu; J Alvarez Cienfuegos
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Definition of large bowel obstruction by primary colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joyce V Veld; Kim J Beek; Esther C J Consten; Frank Ter Borg; Henderik L van Westreenen; Wilhelmus A Bemelman; Jeanin E van Hooft; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.