Literature DB >> 15746781

Electronic tagging of surgical sponges to prevent their accidental retention.

Carl E Fabian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The inadvertent "loss" of surgical sponges, towels, and instruments remains an unsolved problem. The means of preventing this mishap involve an inventory of all implements going in and coming out of the surgical wound, supplemented by a careful search. This work describes a different approach to this problem: tagging articles placed into the wound with markers able to be rapidly detected electronically.
METHODS: Surgical sponges were tagged with either active targets or inert, dummy targets and placed in different locations within the body of 50 cadavers. Using a device we constructed, blinded readings were performed to test the accuracy of detecting retained sponges.
RESULTS: A total of 600 readings were made in 50 cadavers, 300 of active targets and 300 of inert, dummy targets, indistinguishable in appearance. The active markers were detected with 100% accuracy. There were no false positive detections of the dummy tags.
CONCLUSION: The present work demonstrates the feasibility of detecting retained surgical sponges by electronic means blinded to whether the tag contained an active or inert marker.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15746781     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  19 in total

1.  The lost sponge: patient safety in the operating room.

Authors:  Amanda Grant-Orser; Paul Davies; Sukhbir Sony Singh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Retained surgical sponges: what the practicing clinician should know.

Authors:  George H Sakorafas; Dimitrios Sampanis; Christos Lappas; Eva Papantoni; Spyros Christodoulou; Aikaterini Mastoraki; Michael Safioleas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Transmural penetration of sigmoid colon and rectum by retained surgical sponge after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Woo Young Shin; Chan Hyuk Im; Sun Keun Choi; Yun-Mee Choe; Kyung Rae Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  An interesting case of lump abdomen-gossypiboma.

Authors:  N Dash; A S Kushwaha
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Gossypibomas, a surgeon's nightmare-patient demographics, risk factors, imaging and how we can prevent it.

Authors:  Rishi P Mathew; Binston Thomas; Ram S Basti; Hadihally B Suresh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Intra-abdominal Gossypiboma Revisited: Various Clinical Presentations and Treatments of this Potential Complication.

Authors:  Alper Sozutek; Tahsin Colak; Enver Reyhan; Ozgur Turkmenoglu; Edip Akpınar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Gossypiboma and its implications.

Authors:  Ji Umunna
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2012-10

8.  [Retained foreign bodies from the surgical point of view].

Authors:  K Schönleben; A Strobel; F Schönleben; A Hoffmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Caprice C Greenberg; Stephen C Resch; Anantha Kollengode; Robert R Cima; Michael J Zinner; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Beyond a gossypiboma.

Authors:  Abdul Haque M Quraishi
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2012-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.