Literature DB >> 17151842

[Retained foreign bodies from the surgical point of view].

K Schönleben1, A Strobel, F Schönleben, A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

The number of foreign bodies remaining in the patient after a surgical procedure is presumably higher than mentioned in the literature. According to US insurance statistics, the incidence amounts to 1 in 1,500 surgical procedures. As a basic principle--also from the legal aspect--it is necessary to determine whether a foreign body was left in situ accidentally (i.e. due to a material fault) or if it was simply forgotten. In 70% of cases, fabric items (e.g. swabs etc.) are left behind, while around 30% are metal objects. A particularly high risk is seen in emergency settings, in unexpected changes in the surgical procedure, or for patients with a high body mass index. The outcome for the patient differs depending on the nature of the object left behind and the individual patient's situation. Usually, metal items cause more acute clinical symptoms at an earlier time after the operation. Fabric items tend to induce, in the absence of primary contamination, a chronic progression of symptoms over several years. Reoperation has a high mortality (between 11% and 35%). Precautions in terms of risk management have to be established and need to be strictly respected, especially in high risk settings. Visually or acoustically controlled monitoring before wound-closure are recommended to eliminate "human error" as thoroughly as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17151842     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-006-1271-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  29 in total

1.  Forgotten needle--an unusual cause of chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Neena Malhotra; Kallol K Roy; Alka Sinha
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract: intraluminal migration of laparotomy sponge.

Authors:  W H Risher; W M McKinnon
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  The retained surgical sponge.

Authors:  C W Kaiser; S Friedman; K P Spurling; T Slowick; H A Kaiser
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Retained surgical sponge: an unusual cause of intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  J D Wig; M K Goenka; S Suri; P J Sudhakar; K Vaiphei
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Transgastric migration of a surgical sponge.

Authors:  B B Menteş; E Yilmaz; M Sen; B Kayhan; A Görgül; E Tatlicioğlu
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Migration of surgical sponge into small intestine.

Authors:  L B Mason
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-09-23       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Detection of retained surgical sponges.

Authors:  G Revesz; T S Siddiqi; W A Buchheit; M Bonitatibus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).

Authors:  Kamal E Bani-Hani; Kamal A Gharaibeh; Rami J Yaghan
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.767

9.  Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.

Authors:  Alex Macario; Dean Morris; Sharon Morris
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07

10.  Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert; E John Orav; Troyen A Brennan; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Migration of a retained intra-abdominal foreign body into the colon].

Authors:  A Reichelt; G Buchholz; C Schülke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Retained sponge after abdominal surgery: experience from a third world country.

Authors:  Alain Chichom Mefire; Robert Tchounzou; Marc Leroy Guifo; Marcus Fokou; Jean Jacques Pagbe; Arthur Essomba; Eimo Elisée Malonga
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2009-07-05

3.  Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Caprice C Greenberg; Stephen C Resch; Anantha Kollengode; Robert R Cima; Michael J Zinner; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Pulsatile lavage irrigator tip, a rare radiolucent retained foreign body in the pelvis: a case report.

Authors:  Camille L Connelly; Michael T Archdeacon
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2011-05-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.