Literature DB >> 15744844

Mild head injury: revisited.

S P Thiruppathy1, N Muthukumar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 1. To define the incidence of positive CT scans in patients with different grades of mild head injury (MHI), 2. To identify clinical predictors of positive CT scans, 3. To evaluate the usefulness of plain radiographs in the triage of patients with MHI, 4. To evaluate frequency and nature of surgical intervention in MHI, 5. To evaluate the risk of deterioration in MHI, and 6. To find out whether patients with normal neurological examination and normal CT can be safely discharged.
METHODS: In a prospective study conducted over a period of four months in our center, all patients with mild head injury (defined as Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) 13-15) were admitted to the head injury unit. Patients underwent standard clinical examination, skull radiography and cranial CT. No clinical criteria were used to select patients for CT scanning and all the patients were subjected to CT. Patients with negative findings on CT and a normal neurological examination were discharged after 24 hours of observation. Patients with positive findings on cranial CT were treated either medically or surgically as deemed necessary. Outcome measures included safe discharge, clinical deterioration, need for surgical intervention or death. The following factors were analyzed statistically to find out whether they can be used as predictive factors for positive cranial CT. They were: age, sex, mode of injury, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic seizures, ear/ nose/throat bleeding, vomiting, admission GCS score, scalp injury, polytrauma, focal neurological deficit, fractures visualized on skull radiography.
RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty one patients were included in the study. Of these males constituted 63%, females 17% and children 20%. RTA was the most common mode of injury. Seventy five percent of the patients had GCS of 15, 15% had GCS of 14 and 10% had GCS of 13. Thirty eight percent of the patients had positive findings on the CT. Age, mode of injury, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic seizures, ENT bleeding, vomiting, scalp injury and polytrauma were not found to be predictors of positive CT. Admission GCS score, focal neurological deficits, and fractures detected by skull radiography were found to be statistically significant predictors of positive findings on CT. Seven percent of patients required surgical intervention. Six percent of patients showed neurological deterioration and there was one death in this series of MHI patients. Patients with multiple lesions on CT had a higher chance of deterioration than those with a single lesion. No patient who had a GCS of 15 and normal CT developed any complication during the hospital stay or after discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of positive CT scans in this prospective, consecutive, unselected cohort of MHI patients was 38%. Lower admission GCS scores, focal neurological deficits, and fractures detected by skull x-rays were found to be significant predictors of positive CT. Other clinical parameters were not found to be predictors of positive CT. CT was found to be superior to plain x-rays in detecting skull fractures. Seven percent of this cohort required neurosurgical intervention. Six percent showed neurological deterioration and there was one death in this series. Patients with multiple lesions on CT had a higher chance of deterioration than those with single lesions. The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in patients with positive CT. As no patient with a normal neurological examination and a normal CT deteriorated, we believe these patients can be safely discharged without need for admission and observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15744844     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-004-0335-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  9 in total

1.  [The mild traumatic brain injury - a simple theme?].

Authors:  C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Statistical Analysis to Find out the Optimal Locations for Non Invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  [Mild head injury: diagnostic pitfalls and complications].

Authors:  D Kolodziejczyk
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Diagnostic Utility of Conventional Radiography in Head Injury.

Authors:  Hitesh Chawla; Ranjana Malhotra; Rohtas Kumar Yadav; Mahavir S Griwan; Pramod Kumar Paliwal; Akash Deep Aggarwal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

5.  Clinically-important brain injury and CT findings in pediatric mild traumatic brain injuries: a prospective study in a Chinese reference hospital.

Authors:  Huiping Zhu; Qi Gao; Xin Xia; Joe Xiang; Hongli Yao; Jianbo Shao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  [Mild head injury].

Authors:  José Manuel Ortega Zufiría; Noemí Lomillos Prieto; Bernardino Choque Cuba; Martin Tamarit Degenhardt; Pedro Poveda Núñez; María Remedios López Serrano; Azahara Belén López Raigada
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Computed Tomography Profile and its Utilization in Head Injury Patients in Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Archana Waganekar; Jagadish Sadasivan; A Sathia Prabhu; K T Harichandrakumar
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

8.  Outcome from Complicated versus Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Grant L Iverson; Rael T Lange; Minna Wäljas; Suvi Liimatainen; Prasun Dastidar; Kaisa M Hartikainen; Seppo Soimakallio; Juha Ohman
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-19

9.  Neuropsychological outcome and diffusion tensor imaging in complicated versus uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  William J Panenka; Rael T Lange; Sylvain Bouix; Jason R Shewchuk; Manraj K S Heran; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Ryan Eckbo; Martha E Shenton; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.