Literature DB >> 15744739

The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care.

Bernard van den Berg1, Han Bleichrodt, Louis Eeckhoudt.   

Abstract

We provide a new test of the feasibility of using contingent valuation to value informal care. We start with a theoretical model of informal caregiving and derive that willingness to pay depends positively on wealth and negatively on own health, whereas the effect of other's health is sign-ambiguous. These predictions are tested in two new data sets on patients' and caregivers' willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) for informal care. The data are generally consistent with the theoretical predictions: wealth generally has a positive impact and own health a negative impact. Other's health has a mixed effect. We find only small differences between WTP and WTA. Our findings suggest that contingent valuation may be a useful technique to value informal care in economic evaluations of health care. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744739     DOI: 10.1002/hec.980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  28 in total

1.  How to include informal care in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Renske J Hoefman; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  T Lehnert; O H Günther; A Hajek; S G Riedel-Heller; H H König
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-06

3.  Measuring health and well-being effects in family caregivers of children with craniofacial malformations.

Authors:  Nalin Payakachat; J Mick Tilford; Werner Bf Brouwer; N Job van Exel; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Valuing health risk in agriculture: a choice experiment approach to pesticide use in China.

Authors:  Jianjun Jin; Wenyu Wang; Rui He; Haozhou Gong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The Monetary Value of Informal Care: Obtaining Pure Time Valuations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Renske J Hoefman; Job van Exel; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Sheena Arora; Stephen Goodall; Rosalie Viney; Stewart Einfeld
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Valuing Healthcare Goods and Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the WTA-WTP Disparity.

Authors:  Adriënne H Rotteveel; Mattijs S Lambooij; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Job van Exel; Karel G M Moons; G Ardine de Wit
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Measuring and Valuing Informal Care for Economic Evaluation of HIV/AIDS Interventions: Methods and Application in Malawi.

Authors:  Levison S Chiwaula; Paul Revill; Deborah Ford; Misheck Nkhata; Travor Mabugu; James Hakim; Cissy Kityo; Adrienne K Chan; Fabian Cataldo; Diana Gibb; Bernard van den Berg
Journal:  Value Health Reg Issues       Date:  2016-09-16

Review 9.  The Valuation of Informal Care in Cost-of-Illness Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juan Oliva-Moreno; Marta Trapero-Bertran; Luz Maria Peña-Longobardo; Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Differences between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for visits by a family physician: a contingent valuation study.

Authors:  Jesús Martín-Fernández; Ma Isabel del Cura-González; Tomás Gómez-Gascón; Juan Oliva-Moreno; Julia Domínguez-Bidagor; Milagros Beamud-Lagos; Francisco Javier Pérez-Rivas
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.