Literature DB >> 15744292

Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices.

E Knill1.   

Abstract

In theory, quantum computers offer a means of solving problems that would be intractable on conventional computers. Assuming that a quantum computer could be constructed, it would in practice be required to function with noisy devices called 'gates'. These gates cause decoherence of the fragile quantum states that are central to the computer's operation. The goal of so-called 'fault-tolerant quantum computing' is therefore to compute accurately even when the error probability per gate (EPG) is high. Here we report a simple architecture for fault-tolerant quantum computing, providing evidence that accurate quantum computing is possible for EPGs as high as three per cent. Such EPGs have been experimentally demonstrated, but to avoid excessive resource overheads required by the necessary architecture, lower EPGs are needed. Assuming the availability of quantum resources comparable to the digital resources available in today's computers, we show that non-trivial quantum computations at EPGs of as high as one per cent could be implemented.

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744292     DOI: 10.1038/nature03350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  29 in total

1.  Experimental demonstration of topological error correction.

Authors:  Xing-Can Yao; Tian-Xiong Wang; Hao-Ze Chen; Wei-Bo Gao; Austin G Fowler; Robert Raussendorf; Zeng-Bing Chen; Nai-Le Liu; Chao-Yang Lu; You-Jin Deng; Yu-Ao Chen; Jian-Wei Pan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Experimental quantum coding against qubit loss error.

Authors:  Chao-Yang Lu; Wei-Bo Gao; Jin Zhang; Xiao-Qi Zhou; Tao Yang; Jian-Wei Pan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantifying magic for multi-qubit operations.

Authors:  James R Seddon; Earl T Campbell
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Quantum computers.

Authors:  T D Ladd; F Jelezko; R Laflamme; Y Nakamura; C Monroe; J L O'Brien
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Experimental magic state distillation for fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Authors:  Alexandre M Souza; Jingfu Zhang; Colm A Ryan; Raymond Laflamme
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  High-fidelity readout and control of a nuclear spin qubit in silicon.

Authors:  Jarryd J Pla; Kuan Y Tan; Juan P Dehollain; Wee H Lim; John J L Morton; Floris A Zwanenburg; David N Jamieson; Andrew S Dzurak; Andrea Morello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity.

Authors:  M Veldhorst; J C C Hwang; C H Yang; A W Leenstra; B de Ronde; J P Dehollain; J T Muhonen; F E Hudson; K M Itoh; A Morello; A S Dzurak
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Contextuality supplies the 'magic' for quantum computation.

Authors:  Mark Howard; Joel Wallman; Victor Veitch; Joseph Emerson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Experimental deterministic correction of qubit loss.

Authors:  Roman Stricker; Davide Vodola; Alexander Erhard; Lukas Postler; Michael Meth; Martin Ringbauer; Philipp Schindler; Thomas Monz; Markus Müller; Rainer Blatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Quantum computational supremacy.

Authors:  Aram W Harrow; Ashley Montanaro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.