Literature DB >> 28905912

Quantum computational supremacy.

Aram W Harrow1, Ashley Montanaro2.   

Abstract

The field of quantum algorithms aims to find ways to speed up the solution of computational problems by using a quantum computer. A key milestone in this field will be when a universal quantum computer performs a computational task that is beyond the capability of any classical computer, an event known as quantum supremacy. This would be easier to achieve experimentally than full-scale quantum computing, but involves new theoretical challenges. Here we present the leading proposals to achieve quantum supremacy, and discuss how we can reliably compare the power of a classical computer to the power of a quantum computer.

Year:  2017        PMID: 28905912     DOI: 10.1038/nature23458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  16 in total

1.  Thermally assisted quantum annealing of a 16-qubit problem.

Authors:  N G Dickson; M W Johnson; M H Amin; R Harris; F Altomare; A J Berkley; P Bunyk; J Cai; E M Chapple; P Chavez; F Cioata; T Cirip; P Debuen; M Drew-Brook; C Enderud; S Gildert; F Hamze; J P Hilton; E Hoskinson; K Karimi; E Ladizinsky; N Ladizinsky; T Lanting; T Mahon; R Neufeld; T Oh; I Perminov; C Petroff; A Przybysz; C Rich; P Spear; A Tcaciuc; M C Thom; E Tolkacheva; S Uchaikin; J Wang; A B Wilson; Z Merali; G Rose
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Universal adiabatic quantum computation via the space-time circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction.

Authors:  David Gosset; Barbara M Terhal; Anna Vershynina
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  QUANTUM OPTICS. Universal linear optics.

Authors:  Jacques Carolan; Christopher Harrold; Chris Sparrow; Enrique Martín-López; Nicholas J Russell; Joshua W Silverstone; Peter J Shadbolt; Nobuyuki Matsuda; Manabu Oguma; Mikitaka Itoh; Graham D Marshall; Mark G Thompson; Jonathan C F Matthews; Toshikazu Hashimoto; Jeremy L O'Brien; Anthony Laing
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Stringent and efficient assessment of boson-sampling devices.

Authors:  Malte C Tichy; Klaus Mayer; Andreas Buchleitner; Klaus Mølmer
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Hardness of classically simulating the one-clean-qubit model.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Morimae; Keisuke Fujii; Joseph F Fitzsimons
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Improved Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits Dominated by Clifford Gates.

Authors:  Sergey Bravyi; David Gosset
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Average-Case Complexity Versus Approximate Simulation of Commuting Quantum Computations.

Authors:  Michael J Bremner; Ashley Montanaro; Dan J Shepherd
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Observation of spatial charge and spin correlations in the 2D Fermi-Hubbard model.

Authors:  Lawrence W Cheuk; Matthew A Nichols; Katherine R Lawrence; Melih Okan; Hao Zhang; Ehsan Khatami; Nandini Trivedi; Thereza Paiva; Marcos Rigol; Martin W Zwierlein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Computational quantum-classical boundary of noisy commuting quantum circuits.

Authors:  Keisuke Fujii; Shuhei Tamate
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Experimental scattershot boson sampling.

Authors:  Marco Bentivegna; Nicolò Spagnolo; Chiara Vitelli; Fulvio Flamini; Niko Viggianiello; Ludovico Latmiral; Paolo Mataloni; Daniel J Brod; Ernesto F Galvão; Andrea Crespi; Roberta Ramponi; Roberto Osellame; Fabio Sciarrino
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  26 in total

1.  Quantum advantage of unitary Clifford circuits with magic state inputs.

Authors:  Mithuna Yoganathan; Richard Jozsa; Sergii Strelchuk
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup.

Authors:  Andrew M Childs; Dmitri Maslov; Yunseong Nam; Neil J Ross; Yuan Su
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics.

Authors:  Mario Krenn; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Review of some existing QML frameworks and novel hybrid classical-quantum neural networks realising binary classification for the noisy datasets.

Authors:  D Aghamalyan; P Griffin; M Boguslavsky; N Schetakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Power of data in quantum machine learning.

Authors:  Hsin-Yuan Huang; Michael Broughton; Masoud Mohseni; Ryan Babbush; Sergio Boixo; Hartmut Neven; Jarrod R McClean
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Unsupervised Quantum Gate Control for Gate-Model Quantum Computers.

Authors:  Laszlo Gyongyosi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Routing space exploration for scalable routing in the quantum Internet.

Authors:  Laszlo Gyongyosi; Sandor Imre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Locality and entanglement of indistinguishable particles.

Authors:  Till Jonas Frederick Johann; Ugo Marzolino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Observation of exceptional point in a PT broken non-Hermitian system simulated using a quantum circuit.

Authors:  Geng-Li Zhang; Di Liu; Man-Hong Yung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dynamics of entangled networks of the quantum Internet.

Authors:  Laszlo Gyongyosi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.