Literature DB >> 15744058

The number of mutations selected during adaptation in a laboratory population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Clifford Zeyl1.   

Abstract

There is currently limited empirical and theoretical support for the prevailing view that adaptation typically results from the fixation of many mutations, each with small phenotypic effects. Recent theoretical work suggests that, on the contrary, most of the phenotypic change during an episode of adaptation can result from the selection of a few mutations with relatively large effects. I studied the genetics of adaptation by populations of budding yeast to a culture regime of daily hundredfold dilution and transfer in a glucose-limited minimal liquid medium. A single haploid genotype isolated after 2000 generations showed a 76% fitness increase over its ancestor. This evolved haploid was crossed with its ancestor, and tetrad dissections were used to isolate a complete series of six meiotic tetrads. The Castle-Wright estimator of the number of loci at which adaptive mutations had been selected, modified to account for linkage and variation among mutations in the size of their effect, is 4.4. The estimate for a second haploid genotype, isolated from a separate population and with a fitness gain of 60%, was 2.7 loci. Backcrosses to the ancestor with the first evolved genotype support the inference that adaptation resulted primarily from two to five mutations. These backcrosses also indicated that deleterious mutations had hitchhiked with adaptive mutations in this evolved genotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744058      PMCID: PMC1449599          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.027102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  M Imhof; C Schlotterer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The genetic architecture of Drosophila sensory bristle number.

Authors:  Christy L Dilda; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evaluation of biometrical methods for estimating the number of genes : 1. Effect of sample size.

Authors:  D K Mulitze; R J Baker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D R Richards; A R Conway; A L Goldstein; S Kalman; M J McCullough; J H McCusker; D A Stevens; L Wodicka; D J Lockhart; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations.

Authors:  C Paquin; J Adams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C Zeyl; J A DeVisser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Baganz; A Hayes; D Marren; D C Gardner; S G Oliver
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Linkage analysis of molecular markers and quantitative trait loci in populations of inbred backcross lines of Brassica napus L.

Authors:  D V Butruille; R P Guries; T C Osborn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Wach; A Brachat; R Pöhlmann; P Philippsen
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  13 in total

1.  Polymorphic genes of major effect: consequences for variation, selection and evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  John R Stinchcombe; Cynthia Weinig; Katy D Heath; Marcus T Brock; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid selective sweep of pre-existing polymorphisms and slow fixation of new mutations in experimental evolution of Desulfovibrio vulgaris.

Authors:  Aifen Zhou; Kristina L Hillesland; Zhili He; Wendy Schackwitz; Qichao Tu; Grant M Zane; Qiao Ma; Yuanyuan Qu; David A Stahl; Judy D Wall; Terry C Hazen; Matthew W Fields; Adam P Arkin; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Adaptive evolution of Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 during growth on a Nonnative carbon source, L-1,2-propanediol.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution.

Authors:  Robert T Todd; Anja Forche; Anna Selmecki
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  The causes of epistasis.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Tim F Cooper; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Loss of dispensable genes is not adaptive in yeast.

Authors:  Piotr Sliwa; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The role of pleiotropy in the maintenance of sex in yeast.

Authors:  Jessica A Hill; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genome-wide consequences of deleting any single gene.

Authors:  Xinchen Teng; Margaret Dayhoff-Brannigan; Wen-Chih Cheng; Catherine E Gilbert; Cierra N Sing; Nicola L Diny; Sarah J Wheelan; Maitreya J Dunham; Jef D Boeke; Fernando J Pineda; J Marie Hardwick
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Feedback between environment and traits under selection in a seasonal environment: consequences for experimental evolution.

Authors:  Dorian Collot; Thibault Nidelet; Johan Ramsayer; Olivier C Martin; Sylvie Méléard; Christine Dillmann; Delphine Sicard; Judith Legrand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The properties of adaptive walks in evolving populations of fungus.

Authors:  Sijmen E Schoustra; Thomas Bataillon; Danna R Gifford; Rees Kassen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.