Literature DB >> 15742992

Oesophageal cancer incidence and mortality in patients with long-segment Barrett's oesophagus after a mean follow-up of 12.7 years.

M Hage1, P D Siersema, H van Dekken, E W Steyerberg, J Dees, E J Kuipers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on cancer risk in patients with long-segment Barrett's oesophagus (BO) from older studies are often difficult to interpret, since the definition of BO has evolved from an endoscopical to a histological diagnosis. In this work the diagnoses in the Rotterdam BO cohort on current standards was redefined to obtain more accurate data on cancer risk in patients who had not undergone standard endoscopic surveillance. In addition, it was determined which patient factors present at index endoscopy were associated with neoplastic progression in BO.
METHODS: The Rotterdam BO cohort comprises all patients with > or =3 cm BO, diagnosed at endoscopy between 1973 and 1984. In the present study, only patients with intestinal metaplasia were included (n = 105). Follow-up data were obtained by questionnaires and/or interviews with patients or treating physicians. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 20-year risks.
RESULTS: The mean length of the BO was 7.1 cm (range: 3-15 cm). Cancer in BO developed in 6/105 (6%) patients, and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 5/105 (5%) patients during 1329 patient-years of follow-up, which equals one cancer case per 221 patient-years and one HGD case per 266 patient-years. After a mean follow-up of 12.7 years, 72 (69%) patients had died; only 4 of them died of oesophageal cancer or its treatment. A longer length of BO was associated with an increased risk of progression to HGD or cancer (P < 0.02). Six of 24 patients who ever had low-grade dysplasia progressed to HGD or cancer 2-16 years after a diagnosis of BO.
CONCLUSIONS: The annual risk of developing HGD or adenocarcinoma in patients with long-segment BO is 0.83%. Death due to adenocarcinoma is, however, uncommon, even in a cohort of patients with long-segment BO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15742992     DOI: 10.1080/00365520410003524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  27 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Wiseman; Yeng S Ang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Biodegradable esophageal stent placement does not prevent high-grade stricture formation after circumferential mucosal resection in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eric M Pauli; Steve J Schomisch; Joseph P Furlan; Andrea S Marks; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kavel Visrodia; Siddharth Singh; Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; David A Ahlquist; Kenneth K Wang; Prasad G Iyer; David A Katzka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus patients: results from a large population-based study.

Authors:  Shivaram Bhat; Helen G Coleman; Fouad Yousef; Brian T Johnston; Damian T McManus; Anna T Gavin; Liam J Murray
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies high risk Barrett's patients likely to develop esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S M Brankley; K C Halling; S M Jenkins; M R Timmer; P G Iyer; T C Smyrk; E G Barr Fritcher; J S Voss; B R Kipp; M B Campion; L S Lutzke; D M Minot; K K Wang
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  Genetic Insights in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Brian J Reid; Thomas G Paulson; Xiaohong Li
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Barrett's Esophagus after Bimodality Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fatemeh G Amlashi; Xuemei Wang; Raquel E Davila; Dipen M Maru; Manoop S Bhutani; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian R Weston; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Maria Vassilakopoulou; Kazuto Harada; Mariela A Blum Murphy; David C Rice; Wayne L Hofstetter; Marta Davila; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 8.  Reflux esophagitis, high-grade neoplasia, and early Barrett's carcinoma-what is the place of the Merendino procedure?

Authors:  A H Hölscher; D Vallböhmer; C Gutschow; E Bollschweiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  A cost-utility analysis of ablative therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Ma Somsouk; Ryan D Madanick; Jennifer P Thomas; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Endoscopy in the Elderly: a Cautionary Approach, When to Stop.

Authors:  Rita Abdelmessih; Christopher D Packey; Garrett Lawlor
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.