Literature DB >> 15742410

Immune response to an indigenously developed r-hepatitis B vaccine in mixed population: study of an accelerated vaccination schedule.

A Chowdhury1, A Santra, C-M Habibullah, A-A Khan, J Karunakaramaiah, T-S-A Kishore, A-V-R Raju, S Lahiri.   

Abstract

AIM: To establish the safety and efficacy of an indigenously developed r-hepatitis B vaccine using an accelerated schedule and to highlight the social awareness and commitment in preventing the spreading of hepatitis B virus infection.
METHODS: The study was a multicentric, double blind, randomized (3:1) study using three doses of vaccine immunization schedule (20 mug for those above 10 years old and 10 mug for those below 10 years old) on d 0, 30 and 60. One hundred and sixty-six subjects were enrolled (87 males and 76 females aged 5-35 years). The main outcome measure was assessment of immunogenicity and safety.
RESULTS: A 100% seroconversion response was observed on the 30(th) d after the 1(st) injection in both the experimental groups. The sero-protection data reported a 41.2-65.6% response on the 30(th) d after the 1(st) injection and reached 100% on the 60(th) d. Descriptive statistical analysis showed a geometric mean titer value of 13.77 mIU/mL in the test (BEVAC) group and 10.95 mIU/mL in the commercial control (ENGERIX-B) group on the 30(th) d after the 1(st) injection. The response on the 60(th) d showed a geometric mean titre value (GMT) of 519.84 mIU/mL in the BEVAC group and 475.46 mIU/mL in the ENGERIX-B group. On the 90(th) d, the antibody titer response was observed to be 2627.58 mIU/mL in the BEVAC group and 2272.72 mIU/mL in the ENGERIX-B group. Two subjects in each group experienced pains at injection site after the first vaccination. A total of six subjects in both groups experienced a solicited adverse reaction, which included pains, swelling and redness at the injection site, three subjects in the group-B had a pain at the injection site after the third dose. No other serious adverse events occurred and no dose-related local or general symptoms were observed during the study.
CONCLUSION: The vaccine is safe, efficacious and immunogenic in comparison with the well documented ENGERIX-B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15742410      PMCID: PMC4250767          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i7.1037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

1.  Two different dosages of yeast derived recombinant hepatitis B vaccines: a comparison of immunogenicity.

Authors:  M Chiaramonte; S Majori; T Ngatchu; M E Moschen; V Baldo; G Renzulli; I Simoncello; S Rocco; T Bertin; R Naccarato; R Trivello
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Persistence of antibodies after immunization with a recombinant yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine following two different schedules.

Authors:  N Scheiermann; M Gesemann; C Maurer; M Just; R Berger
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine compared with a plasma-derived vaccine in young adults.

Authors:  M Just; R Berger; V Just
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  The public's health unprotected. Reversing a decade of underutilization of hepatitis B vaccine.

Authors:  D P Francis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Comparison of a rapid hepatitis B immunization schedule to the standard schedule for adults.

Authors:  L S Marsano; R N Greenberg; R B Kirkpatrick; R K Zetterman; A Christiansen; D J Smith; M D DeMedina; E R Schiff
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Update on diagnosis, management, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection.

Authors:  F J Mahoney
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Integration of hepatitis B vaccination into national immunisation programmes. Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board.

Authors:  P Van Damme; M Kane; A Meheus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-04-05

Review 8.  Factors influencing the immune response to hepatitis B vaccine, booster dose guidelines, and vaccine protocol recommendations.

Authors:  F B Hollinger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-09-04       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Hepatitis B vaccination with short dose intervals--a possible alternative for post-exposure prophylaxis?

Authors:  M Wahl; S Hermodsson; S Iwarson
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Comparison of the accelerated and classic vaccination schedules against Hepatitis B: three-week Hepatitis B vaccination schedule provides immediate and protective immunity.

Authors:  Nese Saltoğlu; A Seza Inal; Yesim Tasova; Ozlem Kandemir
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 3.944

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Schedules for hepatitis B vaccination of risk groups: balancing immunogenicity and compliance.

Authors:  K Van Herck; E Leuridan; P Van Damme
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.519

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.