Literature DB >> 15740840

A unified view of quiet and perturbed stance: simultaneous co-existing excitable modes.

Robert Creath1, Tim Kiemel, Fay Horak, Robert Peterka, John Jeka.   

Abstract

When standing quietly, human upright stance is typically approximated as a single segment inverted pendulum. In contrast, investigations which perturb upright stance with support surface translations or visual driving stimuli have shown that the body behaves like a two-segment pendulum, displaying both in-phase and anti-phase patterns between the upper and lower body. Here we present evidence that a single-segment characterization of quiet stance is inadequate. Similar to perturbed stance, quiet stance has simultaneously co-existing in-phase and anti-phase patterns. Subjects stood with eyes closed in three sensory conditions: a fixed surface, a foam surface, and a sway-referenced surface. Spectral analysis showed that the body behaved like a multi-link pendulum with two co-existing modes. The angles of the trunk and leg segments were in-phase for frequencies below 1 Hz and anti-phase for frequencies above 1Hz. The shift from in-phase to anti-phase sway showed an abrupt change for the fixed and foam surfaces, but a gradual change for the sway-referenced condition with the trunk showing a phase lead over the legs. The coexistence of in-phase and anti-phase patterns during quiet stance suggests that the ankle and hip strategies are not extremes along a behavioral continuum of mixed strategies. They are "simultaneously co-existing excitable modes", both always present, but one of which may predominate depending upon the characteristics of the available sensory information, task or perturbation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15740840     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.11.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  77 in total

1.  Influence of stance width on frontal plane postural dynamics and coordination in human balance control.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Learning to balance on one leg: motor strategy and sensory weighting.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Marloes van Leeuwen; Gert S Faber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Coordination of muscle torques stabilizes upright standing posture: an UCM analysis.

Authors:  Eunse Park; Hendrik Reimann; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance.

Authors:  Yuanfen Zhang; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance.

Authors:  Marco Dozza; Fay B Horak; Lorenzo Chiari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Comparing single and multi-joint methods to detect knee joint proprioception deficits post primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abderrahman Ouattas; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Nathaniel H Hunt; C Kent Boese; Brian A Knarr
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Influence of Visual Dependence on Inter-Segmental Coordination during Upright Stance in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Carole A Tucker; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Coherence analysis of muscle activity during quiet stance.

Authors:  Mark Saffer; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.