| Literature DB >> 15740613 |
Adeleke O Oginni1, Elugwaraonu A Agbakwuru, Dennis A Ndububa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In various people of the Western world, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) has been reported to be a common problem. Various studies have also assessed the relationship between GOR and dental erosion. The authors are not aware of such studies in Nigerians. It is therefore the aims of the present study to estimate the prevalence of GOR; to estimate the prevalence of dental erosion in patients with GORD; to document the oral findings in patients diagnosed with GORD and to compare these findings with previous studies elsewhere.Entities:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15740613 PMCID: PMC554987 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-5-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Prevalence of GOR and symptoms of GORD
| Symptoms | Male (N = 49) | Female (N = 51) | Total |
| Regurgitation and acidic taste in the mouth | 16 | 19 | 35 |
| Heartburn ≥ 2 per week | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| Heartburn per week | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| Heartburn per month | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Chi Square = 0.10; df = 3; p = 0.99.
Prevalence of dental erosion
| Dental erosion | ||
| Subjects/patients | No (%) | TWI scores |
| M.O.P. (N = 100) | 5 (5) | 1 – 2 |
| GORD (N = 125) | 20 (16) | 1 – 3 |
Mantel Haenszel chi-square = 5.50, p = 0.02.
Endoscopic diagnostic groups: basic data and number of patients withdental erosion
| Diagnostic groups | Number | Mean age (yrs) | Gender | Dental erosion detected | |
| No (%) | ± S.D | Male | Female | ||
| Reflux oesophagitis | 41 (32.8) | 36.9 ± 9.7 | 24 | 17 | 8 |
| Duodenal ulcer | 36 (28.8) | 39.2 ± 11.4 | 16 | 20 | 7 |
| Gastric ulcer | 48 (38.4) | 38.1 ± 11.0 | 17 | 31 | 5 |
Prevalence of erosion between diagnostic groups: Chi-square = 1.33, df = 2, p = 0.51.
Orodental findings in the twenty patients with GORD who had erosions
| S/N | Diagnostic groups*** | Age (yrs) | Gender | Duration (yrs) | TWI scores | Dentine Sensitivity** | BMS* |
| 1 | RO | 26 | Female | 5 | 1–2 | NP | NP |
| 2 | RO | 43 | Female | 10 | 1–3 | P | P |
| 3 | RO | 44 | Male | 10 | 1–3 | NP | NP |
| 4 | RO | 38 | Male | 5–10 | 1 | NP | NP |
| 5 | RO | 48 | Female | 15 | 2–3 | NP | P |
| 6 | RO | 33 | Female | 10 | 1–3 | P | P |
| 7 | RO | 52 | Male | 15 | 2–3 | P | P |
| 8 | RO | 50 | Female | 15 | 2–3 | P | P |
| 9 | DU | 30 | Male | 5–10 | 1–2 | NP | NP |
| 10 | DU | 50 | Male | 20 | 2–3 | P | P |
| 11 | DU | 45 | Female | 15 | 1–3 | NP | NP |
| 12 | DU | 47 | Female | 10 | 1–2 | NP | NP |
| 13 | DU | 33 | Female | 5 | 1 | NP | NP |
| 14 | DU | 36 | Male | 10 | 1–3 | NP | NP |
| 15 | DU | 43 | Male | 15 | 2–3 | P | P |
| 16 | GU | 46 | Female | 10 | 1 | NP | NP |
| 17 | GU | 35 | Female | 10 | 1–2 | NP | NP |
| 18 | GU | 32 | Female | 5 | 1 | NP | NP |
| 19 | GU | 54 | Male | 20 | 2–3 | NP | P |
| 20 | GU | 45 | Male | 15 | 1–3 | NP | P |
*BMS = Burning mouth sensation and sensitivity in the tongue
**NP = Not present, P = Present
***RO = Reflux oesophagitis, DU = Duodenal ulcer, GU = Gastric ulcer.
Figure 1Severe dental erosion affecting the palatal surfaces of the upper anterior teeth in a patient with reflux oesophagitis.