Literature DB >> 15739819

Experience with routine vaginal pH testing in a family practice setting.

Adriana J Pavletic1, Stephen E Hawes, Jenenne A Geske, Kathy Bringe, Susan H Polack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations by Centers for Disease Control and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, pH testing is infrequently performed during the evaluation of vaginitis. Consequently, little information exists on its use in a primary care setting.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe our experience with routine pH testing, particularly the relationship between symptoms, pH and wet-mount microscopy.
METHOD: A retrospective chart review was performed on 203 consecutive cases evaluated for vaginitis by wet-mount microscopy.
RESULTS: Of the 203 cases, 21 had normal pH and no symptoms and 182 had symptoms, elevated pH or both; 85% of cases had abnormal wet-mount findings, including 75% with clue cells, 14% with Trichomonas vaginalis, 13% with yeast and 14% with mixed infections. Asymptomatic infection was present in 42% of cases with clue cells alone, 44% of cases with Trichomonas vaginalis alone, 38% of all trichomoniasis cases and 33% of cases with mixed infections. Elevated pH was associated with clue cells (p < 0.001), trichomoniasis (p = 0.01) and mixed infections (p = 0.003). Normal pH was associated with negative wet mount (p < 0.001) and to a lesser degree with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (p = 0.06).
CONCLUSION: Routine pH testing increased detection of trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis by prompting microscopy in a significant proportion of asymptomatic cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15739819      PMCID: PMC1784594          DOI: 10.1080/10647440400009839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1064-7449


  18 in total

1.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by wet mount identification of bacterial morphotypes in vaginal fluid.

Authors:  H Schmidt; J G Hansen
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.359

2.  The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes.

Authors:  D Hellberg; S Nilsson; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Diagnosis of vaginitis.

Authors:  M E Egan; M S Lipsky
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 4.  Vaginitis.

Authors:  J D Sobel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Vaginal pH as a marker for bacterial pathogens and menopausal status.

Authors:  J C Caillouette; C F Sharp; G J Zimmerman; S Roy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Effect of early oral clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Austin Ugwumadu; Isaac Manyonda; Fiona Reid; Phillip Hay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The infrequent use of office-based diagnostic tests for vaginitis.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; I Macio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Sexually transmitted diseases in a family planning and an antenatal clinic in Peru: limitations of current practices and analysis of the use of potential markers, pH testing, and Whiff testing.

Authors:  D A Thompson; Y K Tsai; R H Gilman; A Vivar; M Calderon
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  A wet smear criterion for bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  H Schmidt; J G Hansen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.581

View more
  5 in total

1.  Higher vaginal pH in Trichomonas vaginalis infection with intermediate Nugent score in reproductive-age women-a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Odisha, India.

Authors:  Padmalaya Das; Tapoja Swain; Jyoti Ranjan Mohanty; Shalini Sinha; Bijay Padhi; Belen Torondel; Oliver Cumming; Bijaya Panda; Arati Nayak; Pinaki Panigrahi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  The prevalence of trichomoniasis and associated factors among women treated at a university hospital in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Fabiane Aguiar Dos Anjos Gatti; Etienne Ceolan; Fernando Salles Rodrigues Greco; Paula Costa Santos; Gabriel Baracy Klafke; Gisele Rodrigues de Oliveira; Andrea Von Groll; Ana Maria Barral de Martinez; Carla Vitola Gonçalves; Carlos James Scaini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Trichomoniasis: How do we diagnose in a resource poor setting?

Authors:  R Sivaranjini; T J Jaisankar; Devinder Mohan Thappa; Rashmi Kumari; Laxmisha Chandrasekhar; M Malathi; Subhash Chandra Parija; Syed Habeebullah
Journal:  Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS       Date:  2013-01

4.  Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota.

Authors:  Deirdre E O'Hanlon; Thomas R Moench; Richard A Cone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of vaginal pH for detection of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  R Hemalatha; Baru Anantha Ramalaxmi; Eluru Swetha; N Balakrishna; Paola Mastromarino
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.