Literature DB >> 10726936

Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by wet mount identification of bacterial morphotypes in vaginal fluid.

H Schmidt1, J G Hansen.   

Abstract

In order to develop a more practical way of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis (BV), we evaluated a scoring system, weighting small bacterial morphotypes versus lactobacillary morphotypes in wet mounts, assessed criteria for BV and normalcy from this scoring, and then evaluated their reproducibility and accuracy. We examined 754 women for pH, homogeneous vaginal discharge, amine odour, clue cells and the composite clinical diagnosis. We also examined wet mounts for small bacterial morphotypes and lactobacillary morphotypes, and weighted their quantitative presence as a bacterial morphotype score. The term 'small bacterial morphotypes' denotes a group of small bacillary forms comprising coccobacilli, tiny rods, and mobile curved rods. The different characteristics of BV were all gradually associated with increased bacterial morphotype scoring. We deemed a score of 0-1 as normal, 2-4 as intermediate phase, grade I, 5-6 as intermediate phase, grade II, and 7-8 indicative of BV. Reproducibility of the interpretation was high, both for the new grading system (weighted Kappa 0.90 in women perceiving and 0.81 in women not perceiving abnormal vaginal discharge) and for the new criterion for BV (non-weighted Kappa 0.91 and 0.84 in the 2 groups of women). The new criterion also proved highly concurrent with the composite clinical diagnosis (Kappa 0.91 and 0.81 in the 2 groups). In conclusion, the wet mount bacterial morphotype scoring is valid for grading of the disorder of the vaginal microbial ecosystem, and the new criterion for BV a more practical option than existing diagnostic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10726936     DOI: 10.1258/0956462001915589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  6 in total

1.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: need for validation of microscopic image area used for scoring bacterial morphotypes.

Authors:  P-G Larsson; B Carlsson; L Fåhraeus; T Jakobsson; U Forsum
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by analysis of first-void-urine specimens.

Authors:  Raluca Datcu; Dionne Gesink; Gert Mulvad; Ruth Montgomery-Andersen; Elisabeth Rink; Anders Koch; Peter Ahrens; Jørgen Skov Jensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques.

Authors:  R F Lamont; J D Sobel; R A Akins; S S Hassan; T Chaiworapongsa; J P Kusanovic; R Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Relative performance of three methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy.

Authors:  Vijaya K Hogan; Jennifer F Culhane; Jane Hitti; Virginia A Rauh; Kelly F McCollum; Kathy J Agnew
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-09-15

5.  Experience with routine vaginal pH testing in a family practice setting.

Authors:  Adriana J Pavletic; Stephen E Hawes; Jenenne A Geske; Kathy Bringe; Susan H Polack
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06

6.  Evaluation of interobserver reliability of Nugent score for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Swapna Muthusamy; Jessy Varghese; Vinod Raveendran; Kavitha Ezilarasan; Joshy Maducolil Easow
Journal:  Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.