Literature DB >> 1573879

Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception.

P W Dawson1, P J Blamey, L C Rowland, S J Dettman, G M Clark, P A Busby, A M Brown, R C Dowell, F W Rickards.   

Abstract

A group of 10 children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults were implanted with the 22-electrode cochlear implant (Cochlear Pty Ltd) at the University of Melbourne Cochlear Implant Clinic and have used the prosthesis for periods from 12 to 65 months. Postoperative performance on the majority of closed-set speech perception tests was significantly greater than chance, and significantly better than preoperative performance for all of the patients. Five of the children have achieved substantial scores on open-set speech tests using hearing without lipreading. Phoneme scores in monosyllabic words ranged from 30% to 72%; word scores in sentences ranged from 26% to 74%. Four of these 5 children were implanted during preadolescence (aged 5:5 to 10:2 years) and the fifth, who had a progressive loss, was implanted during adolescence (aged 14:8 years). The duration of profound deafness before implantation varied from 2 to 8 years. Improvements were also noted over postoperative data collection times for the younger children. The remaining 5 patients who did not demonstrate open-set recognition were implanted after a longer duration of profound deafness (aged 13:11 to 20:1 years). The results are discussed with reference to variables that may affect implant performance, such as age at onset of loss, duration of profound loss, age at implantation, and duration of implantation. They are compared with results for similar groups of children using hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573879     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3502.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  17 in total

Review 1.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Cochlear implants and brain stem implants.

Authors:  Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  [Early hearing experience and sensitive developmental periods].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  J Kiefer; V Gall; C Desloovere; R Knecht; A Mikowski; C von Ilberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Suyog H Chandramouli; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Auditory cortical activation and plasticity after cochlear implantation measured by PET using fluorodeoxyglucose.

Authors:  Zuzanna Łukaszewicz-Moszyńska; Magdalena Lachowska; Kazimierz Niemczyk
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

8.  Speech perception in congenitally deaf children receiving cochlear implants in the first year of life.

Authors:  Bobby A Tajudeen; Susan B Waltzman; Daniel Jethanamest; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Transient Hearing Loss Within a Critical Period Causes Persistent Changes to Cellular Properties in Adult Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.