Literature DB >> 15738774

Clinical measurements of cement injection pressure during vertebroplasty.

Jörg Krebs1, Stephen J Ferguson, Marc Bohner, Gamal Baroud, Thomas Steffen, Paul F Heini.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical study of injection pressure during vertebroplasty.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the range of injection pressures during conventional vertebroplasty interventions and to study the influence of syringe design and cement polymerization time on injection pressure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty is an efficient procedure for the treatment of painful vertebral fractures. However, cement leakage is a potentially serious complication. Although injection pressure has been suggested as a factor for extravasation risk, to date, there are only anecdotal reports of pressure data for cement augmentation in the clinic.
METHODS: Using a syringe holder instrumented with load and displacement transducers, injection pressure and volume were recorded in vivo during conventional cement augmentation. Wide (3 mm opening) and normal (1.8 mm opening) syringes were alternated such that each type was evaluated for early (300-500 seconds postmixing) and late (>500 seconds postmixing) cement polymerization time. The influence of syringe type and polymerization time on injection pressure was evaluated using a multifactorial analysis of variance followed by Scheffe post hoc comparison.
RESULTS: The maximum peak injection pressure measured was 3215 kPa. The average pressure peaks for normal and wide syringes were 1693 +/- 653 kPa and 1727 +/- 597 kPa, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between injection pressures with wide and normal syringes. Higher injection pressures were observed later in the polymerization process.
CONCLUSIONS: High injection pressures approaching 20 atmospheres are reached during conventional vertebroplasty. Widening the syringe tip diameter did not significantly change injection pressures, whereas elapsed time did. Further research is needed to improve injection equipment and materials for vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738774     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000154670.49227.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral compression fractures of benign or malignant origin: a prospective study of 1188 patients with follow-up of 12 months.

Authors:  Anastasios Mpotsaris; Razmin Abdolvahabi; Bastian Hoffleith; Janpeter Nickel; Ali Harati; Christian Loehr; Chun Hee Gerdes; Svenja Hennigs; Werner Weber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Lordoplasty: report on early results with a new technique for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures to restore the lordosis.

Authors:  Rene Orler; Lars H Frauchiger; Uta Lange; Paul F Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic fractures: secured knowledge and open questions].

Authors:  K Bohndorf; R Fessl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  [Biomechanical aspects of vertebral augmentation].

Authors:  H-J Wilke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Intravertebral pressure gradient during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weisskopf; Oliver Miltner; Uwe Maus; Sascha Gravius; Jörg Axel Karl Ohnsorge
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Comparative clinical results of vertebroplasty using jamshidi® needle and bone void filler for acute vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Se-Il Jeon; Il-Seung Choe; Young Sub Kwon; Dae-Hee Seo; Kyu Chang Lee; Sung-Choon Park
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

8.  Characterization of polymeric solutions as injectable vehicles for hydroxyapatite microspheres.

Authors:  Serafim M Oliveira; Isabel F Almeida; Paulo C Costa; Cristina C Barrias; M Rosa Pena Ferreira; M Fernanda Bahia; Mário A Barbosa
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Clinical investigations of polymethylmethacrylate cement viscosity during vertebroplasty and related in vitro measurements.

Authors:  A Boger; K D Wheeler; B Schenk; P F Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement.

Authors:  Mohamed Habib; Hassan Serhan; Connie Marchek; Gamal Baroud
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.