Literature DB >> 33489482

Outcome of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to discogenic under percutaneous laser disc decompression.

Ahmad Shekarchizadeh1, Ali Mohammadi-Moghadam1, Majid Rezvani1, Peyman Rahmani1, Nourallah Eshraghi1, Keyvan Ghadimi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) method was first described by Daniel Choy in Australia in 1987. Therefore, in this study, we examined the clinical signs and symptoms of patients with spinal canal stenosis due to disc protrusion after PLDD surgery.
METHODS: In this clinical trial study, 43 patients with spinal canal stenosis due to lumbar disks who referred to Kashani and Zahra Marzieh educational hospitals from 2006 to 2016 were entered the study. The patients were divided into two groups as discogenic canal stenosis (3 females and 9 males) and complex degenerative disorder (canal stenosis due to discogenic and ligamentos) (16 females and 15 males). Patients underwent PLDD surgery and the clinical manifestations such as back and radicular pain, claudication, and complications of the surgery (hematoma, reoperation, and neurological symptoms) in patients were evaluated until one year after the operation.
RESULTS: After one year of surgery, the mean of back and radicular pains significantly decreased in both groups (P<0.05). All patients with claudication in the discogenic group improved and 35.5% of patients with complex degenerative disorder were not claudication after one year of surgery. The outcomes of treatment in patients with discogenic canal stenosis were 91.7% excellent, and 8.3% fair and in the complex degenerative disorder group were 64.5% excellent, 19.4% good and 16.1% fair (P=0.16). None of the patients had new neurological symptoms, and 12.9% of the complex degenerative disorder group patients needed reoperation.
CONCLUSION: The PLDD method is a better procedure for discogenic canal stenosis than complex degenerative disorder. Therefore, more studies are required in this field for long time. AJND
Copyright © 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Percutaneous laser disc decompression; lumbar canal stenosis; nucleotomy; pain

Year:  2020        PMID: 33489482      PMCID: PMC7811930     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Neurodegener Dis        ISSN: 2165-591X


  20 in total

1.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna Tosteson; Emily Blood; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): twelve years' experience with 752 procedures in 518 patients.

Authors:  D S Choy
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  1998-12

Review 3.  Experimental basis of percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): a review of literature.

Authors:  Barry Schenk; Patrick A Brouwer; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Efficacy of percutaneous laser disc decompression on lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Longxi Ren; Zhengfeng Han; Jianhua Zhang; Tongtong Zhang; Jian Yin; Xibin Liang; Han Guo; Yanjun Zeng
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  No clinically important benefits of surgery over rehabilitation for lumbar spinal stenosis (PEDro synthesis).

Authors:  Gustavo C Machado; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications.

Authors:  Yong Ahn
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Percutaneous laser nucleolysis of lumbar disks.

Authors:  D S Choy; R B Case; W Fielding; J Hughes; W Liebler; P Ascher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional microdiscectomy in sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick A Brouwer; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Wilco C H Jacobs; Barry Schenk; Annette A van den Berg-Huijsmans; Bart W Koes; M A van Buchem; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Maurits van Tulder; Mark Arts; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond Ostelo; Arianne Verhagen; Bart Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effectiveness of percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation; design of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick A Brouwer; Wilco C Peul; Ronald Brand; Mark P Arts; Bart W Koes; Annette A van den Berg; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.