Literature DB >> 15737538

Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions.

Kathryn A Whitehead1, John Colligon, Joanna Verran.   

Abstract

Surfaces were produced with defined topographical features and surface chemistry. Silicon wafers, and wafers with attached nucleopore filters and quantifoils were coated with titanium using ion beam sputtering technology. Irregularly spaced, but regularly featured surface pits, sizes 0.2 and 0.5 microm, and regularly spaced pits with regular features (1 and 2 microm) diameter were produced. The smallest surface feature that could be successfully produced using this system was of diameter 0.2 microm. Ra, the average absolute deviation of the roughness irregularities from the mean line over one sampling length, Rz, the difference in height between the average of the five highest peaks, and the five lowest valleys along the assessment length of the profile and surface area values increased with surface feature size, with Ra values of 0.04-0.217 microm. There was no significant difference between the contact angles observed for smooth titanium surfaces with 0.2 and 0.5 microm features. However, a significant difference in contact angle was observed between the 1 and 2 microm featured surfaces (p<0.005). Substrata were used in microbial retention assays, using a range of unrelated, differently sized microorganisms. Staphylococcus aureus (cells 0.5-1 microm diameter) were retained in the highest numbers. S. aureus was well retained in the 0.5 microm sized pits and began to accumulate within larger surface features. Rod shaped Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1 microm x 3 microm) were preferentially retained, often end on, within the 1 microm surface features. Some daughter cells of Candida albicans blastospores were retained in 2 microm pits. For S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, the greatest numbers of cells were retained in the largest (2 microm) surface features. The number of C. albicans was similar across all the surfaces. The use of defined surfaces in microbial retention assays may lead to a better understanding of the interaction occurring between cells and surface features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15737538     DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  39 in total

1.  Partially Melted Ti6Al4V Particles Increase Bacterial Adhesion and Inhibit Osteogenic Activity on 3D-printed Implants: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Kai Xie; Yu Guo; Shuang Zhao; Lei Wang; Junxiang Wu; Jia Tan; Yangzi Yang; Wen Wu; Wenbo Jiang; Yongqiang Hao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bioinspired Photocatalytic Shark-Skin Surfaces with Antibacterial and Antifouling Activity via Nanoimprint Lithography.

Authors:  Feyza Dundar Arisoy; Kristopher W Kolewe; Benjamin Homyak; Irene S Kurtz; Jessica D Schiffman; James J Watkins
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  Micropatterned surfaces for reducing the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an in vitro study on the effect of sharklet micropatterned surfaces to inhibit bacterial colonization and migration of uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Shravanthi T Reddy; Kenneth K Chung; Clinton J McDaniel; Rabih O Darouiche; Jaime Landman; Anthony B Brennan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Effect of micro- and nanoscale topography on the adhesion of bacterial cells to solid surfaces.

Authors:  Lillian C Hsu; Jean Fang; Diana A Borca-Tasciuc; Randy W Worobo; Carmen I Moraru
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Mechano-bactericidal actions of nanostructured surfaces.

Authors:  Denver P Linklater; Vladimir A Baulin; Saulius Juodkazis; Russell J Crawford; Paul Stoodley; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 6.  The role played by modified bioinspired surfaces in interfacial properties of biomaterials.

Authors:  Thais T Paterlini; Lucas F B Nogueira; Camila B Tovani; Marcos A E Cruz; Rafael Derradi; Ana P Ramos
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-22

7.  Heterogeneous ceramide distributions alter spatially resolved growth of Staphylococcus aureus on human stratum corneum.

Authors:  Joseph M Cleary; Zachary W Lipsky; Minyoung Kim; Cláudia N H Marques; Guy K German
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Multi-disciplinary antimicrobial strategies for improving orthopaedic implants to prevent prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee.

Authors:  Matthew A Getzlaf; Eric A Lewallen; Hilal M Kremers; Dakota L Jones; Carolina A Bonin; Amel Dudakovic; Roman Thaler; Robert C Cohen; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans biofilms on titanium discs with different surface roughness.

Authors:  C S P Tsang; H Ng; A S McMillan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions.

Authors:  Marta Ribeiro; Fernando J Monteiro; Maria P Ferraz
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.