Literature DB >> 15734268

In vivo assessment of regenerate axial stiffness in distraction osteogenesis.

Gudrun Trøite Aarnes1, Harald Steen, Per Ludvigsen, Nicholas A Waanders, Rik Huiskes, Steven A Goldstein.   

Abstract

This paper presents an in vivo test for assessment of regenerate axial stiffness after the distraction phase of lengthening therapy. The test result supplements radiography in evaluating bone healing and assists in determining when the regenerate stiffness is sufficient for removal of the external fixator. The test is non-invasive and does not require fixator removal. The theoretical basis for the method is that an externally applied load is shared between the fixator and the regenerating bone. The amount of load carried by the regenerate depends on its axial stiffness, which increases with advanced mineralization. By measuring the force in the fixator while applying a known external load to the limb, the load-share ratio between fixator and limb can be assessed. A load-share ratio of 100% indicates that the entire load is carried by the fixator. The ratio decreases as the regenerate structure gradually stiffens. In a clinical trial of 22 individuals with tibial lengthening, the fixator was removed when the load-share ratio dropped below 10%. None of the patients experienced fracture after removal of the fixator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734268     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  8 in total

1.  The mechanics of external fixation.

Authors:  Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-02

Review 2.  The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Ze Liu; Hongbin Guo; Jieyu Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  DEXA as a predictor of fixator removal in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Neil Saran; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Subsidence of callotasis zone in distraction osteogenesis after external fixator removal, measured by RSA.

Authors:  Ragnhild B Gunderson; Harald Steen; Joachim Horn; Leif Pål Kristiansen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Is it possible to change of the duration of consolidation period in the distraction osteogenesis with the repetition of extracorporeal shock waves?

Authors:  M-E Onger; C Bereket; I Sener; N Ozkan; E Senel; A-V Polat
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-03-01

6.  Programable Active Fixator System for Systematic In Vivo Investigation of Bone Healing Processes.

Authors:  Jan Barcik; Manuela Ernst; Constantin E Dlaska; Ludmil Drenchev; Stephan Zeiter; Devakara R Epari; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  [A comparative study of Taylor spatial frame and unilateral external fixator in treatment of tibiofibular open fractures].

Authors:  He Ma; Hui Yao; Tao Zhang; Chunyou Wan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15

8.  Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely.

Authors:  Yanshi Liu; Feiyu Cai; Kai Liu; Xingpeng Zhang; Hong Li; Xuefei Fu; Tao Zhang; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.