Literature DB >> 15733788

Effects of coil dimensions and field polarization on RF heating inside a head phantom.

Alayar Kangarlu1, Tamer S Ibrahim, Frank G Shellock.   

Abstract

Deterioration of radiofrequency (RF) inhomogeneity with increasing static magnetic field in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the fundamental challenges preventing their clinical rendition and posing safety hazards. Variation in RF coil designs could help redistribute RF energy absorption over the imaged object. This work is intended to determine experimentally the difference in RF heating produced within a human head phantom by in situ measurement of RF inhomogeneity as a function of coil design utilized at 8 T. The heating patterns of 1/4 wavelength (long) and 1/8 wavelength 11-cm (short) transverse electromagnetic (TEM) coils loaded with a homogeneous human head phantom at 340 MHz were evaluated. In addition, different transmit/receive (T/R) configurations were used in search for the possibility of "hot-spot" formation. Fluoroptic thermometry was used to measure temperatures in multiple positions in a head phantom made of ground turkey breast for RF powers corresponding to a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4.0 W/kg for 10 min. Numerical simulations were performed to study the general RF power deposition patterns in phantoms at 340 MHz including the effects of field polarization. The temperature increases varied from 0 to 0.8 degrees C for the long RF coil, while the short RF coil produced a maximum temperature change of 0.5 degrees C. Similar to ultra high-field electromagnetic simulations, these measurements revealed low peripheral and high deep-tissue heating at 8 T. The findings indicated that the largest temperature changes for both cases were less than 1 degrees C. While these results showed an increase in localized heating due to RF pulses at 8 T, they highlight that RF inhomogeneity could be redistributed using different RF coil designs through which the hot spots could be made cooler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15733788     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  9 in total

1.  Radiofrequency heating at 9.4T: in vivo temperature measurement results in swine.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Timothy Hanson; Robert Schlentz; William Gallaghar; Carl Snyder; Lance Delabarre; Surya Prakash; Paul Iaizzo; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Implementation of a comprehensive MR safety course for medical students.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Studies of RF Shimming Techniques with Minimization of RF Power Deposition and Their Associated Temperature Changes.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Yik-Kiong Hue; Tamer S Ibrahim
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.176

4.  Direct cooling of the catheter tip increases safety for CMR-guided electrophysiological procedures.

Authors:  Theresa Reiter; Daniel Gensler; Oliver Ritter; Ingo Weiss; Wolfgang Geistert; Ralf Kaufmann; Sabine Hoffmeister; Michael T Friedrich; Stefan Wintzheimer; Markus Düring; Peter Nordbeck; Peter M Jakob; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Ideal current patterns yielding optimal signal-to-noise ratio and specific absorption rate in magnetic resonance imaging: computational methods and physical insights.

Authors:  Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Radiofrequency heating in porcine models with a "large" 32 cm internal diameter, 7 T (296 MHz) head coil.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Timothy Hanson; Jeramy Kulesa; Jinfeng Tian; Gregor Adriany; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

8.  Stepped impedance resonators for high-field magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Can E Akgun; Lance DelaBarre; Hyoungsuk Yoo; Sung-Min Sohn; Carl J Snyder; Gregor Adriany; Kamil Ugurbil; Anand Gopinath; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Electrodynamic constraints on homogeneity and radiofrequency power deposition in multiple coil excitations.

Authors:  Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Aaron K Grant; Yudong Zhu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.