Literature DB >> 15733767

Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Demetris Yannopoulos1, Scott McKnite, Tom P Aufderheide, Gardar Sigurdsson, Ronald G Pirrallo, David Benditt, Keith G Lurie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest that generation of negative intrathoracic pressure during the decompression phase of CPR improves hemodynamics, organ perfusion and survival. HYPOTHESIS: Incomplete chest wall recoil during the decompression phase of standard CPR increases intrathoracic pressure and right atrial pressure, impedes venous return, decreases compression-induced aortic pressures and results in a decrease of mean arterial pressure, coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure.
METHODS: Nine pigs in ventricular fibrillation (VF) for 6 min, were treated with an automated compression/decompression device with a compression rate of 100 min(-1), a depth of 25% of the anterior-posterior diameter, and a compression to ventilation ratio of 15:2 with 100% decompression (standard CPR) for 3 min. Compression was then reduced to 75% of complete decompression for 1 min of CPR and then restored for another 1 min of CPR to 100% full decompression. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as the diastolic (aortic (Ao)-right atrial (RA) pressure). Cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP) was calculated multiple ways: (1) the positive area (in mmHg s) between aortic pressure and intracranial pressure (ICP) waveforms, (2) the coincident difference in systolic and diastolic aortic and intracranial pressures (mmHg), and (3) CerPP = MAP--ICP. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis and all values were expressed as mean +/- S.E.M. The power of the study for an alpha level of significance set at 0.05 was >0.90.
RESULTS: With CPR performed with 100%-75%-100% of complete chest wall recoil, respectively, the CPP was 23.3 +/- 1.9, 15.1 +/- 1.6, 16.6 +/- 1.9, p = 0.003; CerPP was: (1) area: 313.8 +/- 104, 89.2 +/- 39, 170.5 +/- 42.9, p = 0.03, (2) systolic aortic minus intracranial pressure difference: 22.8 +/- 3.6, 16.5 +/- 4, 23.7 +/- 4.5, p = n.s., and diastolic pressure difference: 5.7 +/- 3, -2.4 +/- 2.4, 3.2 +/- 2.5, p = 0.04 and (3) mean: 14.3 +/- 3, 7 +/- 2.9, 12.4 +/- 2.9, p = 0.03, diastolic aortic pressure was 28.1 +/- 2.5, 20.7 +/- 1.9, 20.9 +/- 2.1, p = 0.0125; ICP during decompression was 22.8 +/- 1.7, 23 +/- 1.5, 19.7 +/- 1.7, p = n.s. and mean ICP was 37.1 +/- 2.3, 35.5 +/- 2.2, 35.2 +/- 2.4, p = n.s.; RA diastolic pressure 4.8 +/- 1.3, 5.6 +/- 1.2, 4.3 +/- 1.2 p = 0.1; MAP was 52 +/- 2.9, 43.3 +/- 3, 48.3 +/- 2.9, p = 0.04; decompression endotracheal pressure, -0.7 +/- 0.1, -0.3 +/- 0.1, -0.75 +/- 0.1, p = 0.045.
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete chest wall recoil during the decompression phase of CPR increases endotracheal pressure, impedes venous return and decreases mean arterial pressure, and coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15733767     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  53 in total

1.  Use of the impedance threshold device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Theano D Demestiha; Ioannis N Pantazopoulos; Theodoros T Xanthos
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-26

2.  Closed-loop controller for chest compressions based on coronary perfusion pressure: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Chunfei Wang; Guang Zhang; Taihu Wu; Ningbo Zhan; Yaling Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The impact of a step stool on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a cross-over mannequin study.

Authors:  Dana P Edelson; Shawn L Call; Trevor C Yuen; Terry L Vanden Hoek
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Carly Alexander; Charles Lick; Brent Myers; Laurie Romig; Levon Vartanian; Joseph Stothert; Scott McKnite; Tim Matsuura; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith Lurie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Correlations between quality indexes of chest compression.

Authors:  Feng-Ling Zhang; Li Yan; Su-Fang Huang; Xiang-Jun Bai
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2013

6.  Blood Pressure Directed Booster Trainings Improve Intensive Care Unit Provider Retention of Excellent Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills.

Authors:  Heather Wolfe; Matthew R Maltese; Dana E Niles; Elizabeth Fischman; Veronika Legkobitova; Jessica Leffelman; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert M Sutton
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.454

7.  New Developments in Cardiac Arrest Management.

Authors:  Matthias L Riess
Journal:  Adv Anesth       Date:  2016

8.  How Bad Is It to Fail at Pushing Hard and Fast in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

Authors:  Cameron Dezfulian; Ericka L Fink
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Leaning during chest compressions impairs cardiac output and left ventricular myocardial blood flow in piglet cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Ronald W Hilwig; James Ranger-Moore; Jon Nysaether; Vinay M Nadkarni; Marc D Berg; Karl B Kern; Robert Sutton; Robert A Berg
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.

Authors:  Michael Ackerman; Dianne L Atkins; John K Triedman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.