Literature DB >> 15733198

Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: the Iraq War 2003.

Stephan Lewandowsky1, Werner G K Stritzke, Klaus Oberauer, Michael Morales.   

Abstract

Media coverage of the 2003 Iraq War frequently contained corrections and retractions of earlier information. For example, claims that Iraqi forces executed coalition prisoners of war after they surrendered were retracted the day after the claims were made. Similarly, tentative initial reports about the discovery of weapons of mass destruction were all later disconfirmed. We investigated the effects of these retractions and disconfirmations on people's memory for and beliefs about war-related events in two coalition countries (Australia and the United States) and one country that opposed the war (Germany). Participants were queried about (a) true events, (b) events initially presented as fact but subsequently retracted, and (c) fictional events. Participants in the United States did not show sensitivity to the correction of misinformation, whereas participants in Australia and Germany discounted corrected misinformation. Our results are consistent with previous findings in that the differences between samples reflect greater suspicion about the motives underlying the war among people in Australia and Germany than among people in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15733198     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  17 in total

1.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; David T W Tang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

2.  Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; Briony Swire; Darren Chang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

3.  Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect.

Authors:  Andrea E O'Rear; Gabriel A Radvansky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

4.  Unveiling the truth: warnings reduce the repetition-based truth effect.

Authors:  Lena Nadarevic; André Aßfalg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-18

5.  Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; Olivia Fenton; Kelsey Martin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

6.  Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence.

Authors:  John Cook; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.

Authors:  Briony Swire; Adam J Berinsky; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Ziggy O'Reilly; Jesse S Reid; Ee Pin Chang
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2019-03-02

9.  Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Brandon K N Sze; Matthew Andreotta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; John Cook; Klaus Oberauer; Michael Marriott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.