Literature DB >> 15733162

Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation.

Miles Bore1, Don Munro, Ian Kerridge, David Powis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Consideration has been given to the use of tests of moral reasoning in the selection procedure for medical students. We argue that moral orientation, rather than moral reasoning, might be more efficacious in minimising the likelihood of inappropriate ethical behaviour in medicine. A conceptualisation and measure of moral orientation are presented, together with findings from 11 samples of medical school applicants and students. AIM: To provide empirical evidence for the reliability and validity of a measure of moral orientation and to explore gender, age, cultural and educational influences on moral orientation.
METHODS: A questionnaire designed to measure a libertarian-dual-communitarian dimension of moral orientation was completed by 7864 medical school applicants and students in Australia, Israel, Fiji, New Zealand, Scotland and England and by 84 Australian psychology students between 1997 and 2001.
RESULTS: Older respondents produced marginally higher (more communitarian) moral orientation scores, as did women compared to men. Minor but significant (P <0.05) cultural differences were found. The Israeli samples produced higher mean moral orientation scores, while the Australian psychology student sample produced a lower (more libertarian) mean score relative to all other samples. No significant change in moral orientation score was observed after 1 year in a sample of Australian medical school students (n=59), although some differences observed between 5 cohorts of Australian medical students (Years 1-5; n=234) did reach significance. Moral orientation scores were found to be significantly correlated with a number of personality measures, providing evidence of construct validity. In all samples moral orientation significantly predicted the moral decisions made in response to the hypothetical dilemmas embedded in the measurement instrument. Discussion The results provide support for the conceptualisation of a libertarian-dual-communitarian dimension of moral orientation and demonstrate the psychometric properties of the measurement instrument. A number of questions concerning the use of such tests in selection procedures are considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15733162     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  9 in total

1.  Polemic: five proposals for a medical school admission policy.

Authors:  C Cowley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Competing duties: medical educators, underperforming students, and social accountability.

Authors:  Thalia Arawi; Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?

Authors:  Katie Page
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Undergraduate nursing students' compatibility with the nursing profession.

Authors:  Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery; Mansur Dianati
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Predictors of fitness to practise declarations in UK medical undergraduates.

Authors:  Lewis W Paton; Paul A Tiffin; Daniel Smith; Jon S Dowell; Lazaro M Mwandigha
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility?

Authors:  Nithesh Naik; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Dasharathraj K Shetty; Dishant Swain; Milap Shah; Rahul Paul; Kaivalya Aggarwal; Sufyan Ibrahim; Vathsala Patil; Komal Smriti; Suyog Shetty; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Piotr Chlosta; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-14

7.  Graduate entry to medicine: widening psychological diversity.

Authors:  David James; Eamonn Ferguson; David Powis; Miles Bore; Don Munro; Ian Symonds; Janet Yates
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Artificial intelligence in hospitals: providing a status quo of ethical considerations in academia to guide future research.

Authors:  Milad Mirbabaie; Lennart Hofeditz; Nicholas R J Frick; Stefan Stieglitz
Journal:  AI Soc       Date:  2021-06-28

9.  The ability of 'non-cognitive' traits to predict undergraduate performance in medical schools: a national linkage study.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Finn; Lazaro Mwandigha; Lewis W Paton; Paul A Tiffin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.