Candice N Holmes1. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a history of previous varicella infection provides a reliable marker for prior infection. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE was searched from January 1996 to May 2002 using the MeSH headings "varicella," "chickenpox" and "medical history taking." Recommendations in this paper are based on evidence from well designed cross-sectional studies. MAIN MESSAGE: Serologic testing is advised, rather than presumptive vaccination, for those with a negative or uncertain history of varicella; most will be immune. For those with a positive history of varicella, the advice given depends on the population. For populations at higher risk of varicella infection (eg, health care workers, pregnant women), routine serum testing is recommended. For low-risk populations, physicians could accept a positive history of varicella as a reliable indicator of immunity. CONCLUSION: Most studies found that patients' history of varicella had a high positive predictive value and a low negative predictive value. These findings suggest that a positive history of varicella is a reliable marker of disease while a negative history does not not predict lack of immunity.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a history of previous varicella infection provides a reliable marker for prior infection. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE was searched from January 1996 to May 2002 using the MeSH headings "varicella," "chickenpox" and "medical history taking." Recommendations in this paper are based on evidence from well designed cross-sectional studies. MAIN MESSAGE: Serologic testing is advised, rather than presumptive vaccination, for those with a negative or uncertain history of varicella; most will be immune. For those with a positive history of varicella, the advice given depends on the population. For populations at higher risk of varicella infection (eg, health care workers, pregnant women), routine serum testing is recommended. For low-risk populations, physicians could accept a positive history of varicella as a reliable indicator of immunity. CONCLUSION: Most studies found that patients' history of varicella had a high positive predictive value and a low negative predictive value. These findings suggest that a positive history of varicella is a reliable marker of disease while a negative history does not not predict lack of immunity.
Authors: T A Lieu; S B Black; H Takahashi; P Ray; A M Capra; H R Shinefield; N E Adler Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Roberto Biselli; Roberto Nisini; Florigio Lista; Alberto Autore; Marco Lastilla; Giuseppe De Lorenzo; Mario Stefano Peragallo; Tommaso Stroffolini; Raffaele D'Amelio Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-08-22
Authors: P A C Maple; J Haedicke; M Quinlivan; S P Steinberg; A A Gershon; K E Brown; J Breuer Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Tamar A Smith-Norowitz; Joby Josekutty; Jonathan I Silverberg; Hadar Lev-Tov; Yitzchok M Norowitz; Stephan Kohlhoff; Maja Nowakowski; Helen G Durkin; Martin H Bluth Journal: Int J Biomed Sci Date: 2009-12
Authors: Z Gao; J G Wood; H F Gidding; A T Newall; R I Menzies; H Wang; P B McIntyre; C R MacIntyre Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Francesco Vairo; Virginia Di Bari; Vincenzo Panella; Giuseppe Quintavalle; Saul Torchia; Maria Cristina Serra; Maria Teresa Sinopoli; Maurizio Lopalco; Giancarlo Ceccarelli; Federica Ferraro; Sabrina Valle; Licia Bordi; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi; Vincenzo Puro; Paola Scognamiglio; Giuseppe Ippolito Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2017-11