Literature DB >> 15732212

Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.

Roger L Jansson.   

Abstract

Two sets of federal regulations, the "Common Rule" and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, govern human subject research that is either federally-funded or involves FDA regulated products. These regulations require, inter alia, that: (1) researchers obtain informed consent from human subjects, and (2) that an Institutional Review Board (IRB) independently review and approve the research protocol. Although the federal regulations do not provide an express cause of action against researchers, research subjects should be able to bring informed consent and malpractice actions against researchers by establishing a duty of care and standard of care. Researchers owe human subjects a duty of care analogous to the special relationship between physicians and patients. The federal regulations should provide the minimum standard of care for informed consent in human subject research, and complying with them should be a partial defense. In contrast, expert testimony should establish the standard of care for researcher malpractice, and IRB approval should be a partial defense.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Federal Policy (Common Rule) for the Protection of Human Subjects 1991; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15732212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wash Law Rev        ISSN: 0043-0617


  7 in total

1.  Deliberate Microbial Infection Research Reveals Limitations to Current Safety Protections of Healthy Human Subjects.

Authors:  David L Evers; Carol B Fowler; Jeffrey T Mason; Rebecca K Mimnall
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Research participation as work: comparing the perspectives of researchers and economically marginalized populations.

Authors:  Peter Davidson; Kimberly Page
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Audit of the informed consent process as a part of a clinical research quality assurance program.

Authors:  Pramod M Lad; Rebecca Dahl
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Finding Fault? Exploring Legal Duties to Return Incidental Findings in Genomic Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Pike; Karen H Rothenberg; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Georgetown Law J       Date:  2014

Review 5.  The parameters of informed consent.

Authors:  Edward L Raab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

6.  Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: how can IRBS respond to participant complaints?

Authors:  Kristen Underhill
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Jordan Paradise; Charlisse Caga-anan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.